If you want to have a proper conversation, you have to respond to all questions, otherwise people will feel left out.
Every suggestion needs to be handled in a same way if you want to keep people happy, anything outside of that is just straight up bad.
Thanks for agreeing with my point.
In your system this would lead to many suggestions being outright ignored just because not many people are interested, regardless if that suggestion is actually much better than those popular ones.
There you go again with your premise that popular = more important.
Something receiving more attention doesn’t mean the change itself is any more egregious.
You either give reasoning for everything or for nothing.
Small suggestion
Challenger 3TD Reduce the reload to 5.5 seconds aced instead of 6
The reduction of mobility, lack of turret spall liner and no blowout panels warrants a small increase in reload imo, this was meant to be the pinnacle of the UK tech tree but has fallen behind. If reload is a balancing factor then help this vehicle be more useful. It’s not on par with leopards at its BR and should be allowed a small reload buff to counteract it’s flaws.
Vehicule : Turm III
Actual battle rating : 8.3
Change to : 8.7/9.0
Popular premium and powerful vehicule with the 30mm coaxial / 105mm cannon combo, fast reload, and highly mobile.
The 8.3 rating is too low for this vehicle. Lately there has been a consensus on the number of nuclear bombs dropped partly by the type of vehicle and the most used was precisely the Turm III. The other reason is, T-55AM (9.0) and Object 140 (going to 8.7) are raised in Battlerating too.
VT-5 11.3→11.0
VT-5 should remake it armor and should have BTA-2 at such a high BR but -5° and slow 5s reload when 90105 in only 10.3 and have a similar performance
Thoughts on the EJ Kai going down to 12.0? It is better than the other 12.0 F4s but also not worth 12.3 considering the Hornet is the same BR. Yet another example of why compression is screwing certain planes.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles Vehicle: Lvkv m/42 BR Change (with correct slsgr m/483 HE-T shell and AP standard from AMX-13 DCA 40) (Bug Report Reference): Concomitant balance change without BR changes
Reasoning:
The Lvkv 42 currently uses HEFI and SAP-HEI shells from the L/60 gun, which could not be fired by the Lvakan 48 (L/70). Replacing these with historically accurate slsgr m/483 HE-T shells and the AMX-13 DCA-40 AP round fixes anti-air performance without changing ground vehicle balance. Ground penetration stays the same, so BR 4.7 remains appropriate. This corrects the historical ammo bug reported by Mcpuff (link).
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles Vehicle: VEAK 40 BR Change (with correct slsgr m/483 HE-T shell and AP standard from AMX-13 DCA 40) (Bug Report Reference): 7.7 → 7.3 (Recommended)
Reasoning:
The Lvkv 42 currently uses HEFI and SAP-HEI shells from the L/60 gun, which could not be fired by the Lvakan 48 (L/70). Replacing these with historically accurate slsgr m/483 HE-T shells and the AMX-13 DCA-40 AP round fixes anti-air performance without changing ground vehicle balance. Ground penetration stays the same. And due to very weak limited armor and poorly placed ammunition placement and a basic radar, BR 7.3 better reflects its overall capabilities. This resolves the historical ammo issue noted by Mcpuff (link).
Edit: Response to feedback.
Edit: Made it simpler and more like the bug report.
(Up to) 6x AIM-9Js, decent radar and IRST, a mere 30kph slower than say… F-104G at 10.7, which it outmaneuvers in any situation. It is easily one of, if not THE top fighter at 10.3