I consider the superior performance of thermals and bullets to be a great advantage .
I think that vehicle-specific and nation-wide weaknesses need to be considered separately.
mmm, shame, Id be interested to see the battles per day to be honest.
To be fair, I’ve really been enjoying the Leo 1a2 when I can drag myself away from my beloved FV107 and Type 16s. So I can see people enjoying the Leo 1 still. I really should get around to grinding the German tree…
If you want to have a proper conversation, you have to respond to all questions, otherwise people will feel left out.
Every suggestion needs to be handled in a same way if you want to keep people happy, anything outside of that is just straight up bad.
Thanks for agreeing with my point.
In your system this would lead to many suggestions being outright ignored just because not many people are interested, regardless if that suggestion is actually much better than those popular ones.
There you go again with your premise that popular = more important.
Something receiving more attention doesn’t mean the change itself is any more egregious.
You either give reasoning for everything or for nothing.
I consider the superior performance of mobility, gun handling, gun depression and reload speed to be a great advantage.
I don’t, as those are still applied to a vehicle basis and are directly affecting it’s performance.
Small suggestion
Challenger 3TD Reduce the reload to 5.5 seconds aced instead of 6
The reduction of mobility, lack of turret spall liner and no blowout panels warrants a small increase in reload imo, this was meant to be the pinnacle of the UK tech tree but has fallen behind. If reload is a balancing factor then help this vehicle be more useful. It’s not on par with leopards at its BR and should be allowed a small reload buff to counteract it’s flaws.
1 Like
Vehicule : Turm III
Actual battle rating : 8.3
Change to : 8.7/9.0
Popular premium and powerful vehicule with the 30mm coaxial / 105mm cannon combo, fast reload, and highly mobile.
The 8.3 rating is too low for this vehicle. Lately there has been a consensus on the number of nuclear bombs dropped partly by the type of vehicle and the most used was precisely the Turm III. The other reason is, T-55AM (9.0) and Object 140 (going to 8.7) are raised in Battlerating too.
6 Likes
But you’ve never used it?
It’s crazy how 1940 Bf 109s and Spitfires can see the P2W Yak-3 from 1944.
Like, WTH.
3 Likes
just dont look at teh introduction date of the wyvern
1 Like
I would like to end this discussion as further discussion will lead to a parallel line.
I think I understand your opinion, although it differs from mine.
I would like to thank you for the fruitful discussion.
1 Like
shenyang F5 9.3→9.0
why this still same br as a mig21
This has to be bait
F104J 10.3→10.7
F104g CN 10.7→10.3
104j have more aim9J but at lower BR
Has an afterburner. Can’t be same BR as MiG-17AS
VT-5 11.3→11.0
VT-5 should remake it armor and should have BTA-2 at such a high BR but -5° and slow 5s reload when 90105 in only 10.3 and have a similar performance
how to explain cl13b and f86f40 at same br ?
same as sagittario 2 and ariete
not a excuse but only bias to F5
Thoughts on the EJ Kai going down to 12.0? It is better than the other 12.0 F4s but also not worth 12.3 considering the Hornet is the same BR. Yet another example of why compression is screwing certain planes.
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: Lvkv m/42
BR Change (with correct slsgr m/483 HE-T shell and AP standard from AMX-13 DCA 40) (Bug Report Reference): Concomitant balance change without BR changes
Reasoning:
The Lvkv 42 currently uses HEFI and SAP-HEI shells from the L/60 gun, which could not be fired by the Lvakan 48 (L/70). Replacing these with historically accurate slsgr m/483 HE-T shells and the AMX-13 DCA-40 AP round fixes anti-air performance without changing ground vehicle balance. Ground penetration stays the same, so BR 4.7 remains appropriate.
This corrects the historical ammo bug reported by Mcpuff (link).
Mode: Ground Realistic Battles
Vehicle: VEAK 40
BR Change (with correct slsgr m/483 HE-T shell and AP standard from AMX-13 DCA 40) (Bug Report Reference): 7.7 → 7.3 (Recommended)
Reasoning:
The Lvkv 42 currently uses HEFI and SAP-HEI shells from the L/60 gun, which could not be fired by the Lvakan 48 (L/70). Replacing these with historically accurate slsgr m/483 HE-T shells and the AMX-13 DCA-40 AP round fixes anti-air performance without changing ground vehicle balance. Ground penetration stays the same. And due to very weak limited armor and poorly placed ammunition placement and a basic radar, BR 7.3 better reflects its overall capabilities.
This resolves the historical ammo issue noted by Mcpuff (link).
Edit: Response to feedback.
Edit: Made it simpler and more like the bug report.
Thank you for your time and consideration.
14 Likes
it shouldnt move. its at a perfect BR. the thing is so light any autocannon can destroy it. even AA’s.
Air Simulator
F-86K 9.3 → 9.0
Heavy, compresses heavily, lacking in flight performance vs other 9.3 subsonics
3 Likes