Ho-ri br decrease anyone?
Like all Ho-Ri production has better than Jagtiger is engine power (only ho-ri production) and its almost br higher it really should go back to 7.0 at least or even 6.7 since Jagtiger is 6.7. While premium Ho-Ri prototype at 6.7 is just joke aggainst other heavy tank destroyers tbf. should be 6.0 at best since even Jagdpanther is way better.
Ho-ri prototype 6.7 br vs Jagtiger 6.7 br:
Good mobility+armor=amazing
It has above avrage mobility
And while dm13 is better its still has good shell that can pen all tanks with no issue with great spall
Rly great tank it is one of if not the best tank in 8.7 and it can go up with no issue
Preferrably these changes should be implemented together with removing the airspawn of wyverns. Either as an energy fighter or bomber, these things will make most players have a frustrating day, either getting shot down by it or unable to chase it in most fighters.
Most bombers with forward armaments are not particularly agile. Tu-2 is an exception and it may change, everyone else has only a handful of 50cals at most.
How do British, highlight, British bombers deal with them using .303s?
U compare top tier aps?
The fact ur immune to (yes immune) to atgms from the front is huge
Add the great armor good mobility and nice canon that can pen things with no issue and u got a monster in 8.7
Removing bomber spawn from torpedo/dive bomber like ryusei is absurd. Its never gonna happend since they would have to remove airspawn from every fighter bomber. Ryusei is not attacker. People in Helldivers, Avengers, Ryusei or stuff like that get kills because the enemy is bad and dont expect bombers to dive at them. Not because their planes are some wonder weapon. They are still heavy bricks and will lose in dogfight if you play correctly.
Helldivers are extremely stiff and they are dumb in roll. To attack a stirling Mk. III - a 4.7 bomber mind you, it is still more than adequate. They are only able to engage a few target before the energy runs out, but some of those targets are either completely incapable of retaliation or is poorly suited for it. Again, stirlings: four .303s on a side on or head on, zero defense for coming under.
…So what was your original point then? They’re both still easily killed by LFP and anywhere with ERA on any of the T-72s is a strong point. I can’t say I’ve ever been penned through my UFP without the ERA in that spot being destroyed. Meaning the TURMS-T is just a B with thermals.
What great armour?
the T55AMD-1 has the same turret as a T55 which is a modified T54 turret…
The hull while has the composite on it can be shot clean through by any of the 105mm APDS at 8.3 never mind 8.7
Its not good, its mediocre, not good or bad.
Completely ignoring the fact its got one of the worst rounds for the BR in its APFSDS, it may have APHE, and a missile but you shouldn’t be using either of those over an APFSDS.
As well as all of this, you’ve never even used the T55AM1 or AMD1.
Its a good 8.7, there are far better tanks at 8.7 than the T55AM1 and AMD1
hell even the object 435 is miles ahead of both of them.
the tank while good for 8.7 should not be forced to face off against 10.0s! have you ever fought a leopard 2K in a T55? it doesn’t work.
Youve got 125mm of angle pen which is about 100 less than most 10.0s have.
Most tanks dont have an APS period, there arent many in game as far as im aware, the BN, the VT4A1, the one on the megachs and the APS on the T55 and T80.
thats it.
The fact is, the T55 APS is still one of the worst in game, regardless of the BR.
If you see the thing pointing at you, and you fire an ATGM at it, that is a skill issue.
Its not though, its about the same and only 2kmph faster, hence the comparison to the chieftain.
You are completely ignoring.
better reload-
substantially better round
similar mobility.
better layout and survivability.
better ammo positioning
better crew positioning.
T-62 aint that good at all, the object 435 takes what is bad on the T62 and improves on it.
E.g roof MG, better profile, marginally better mobility.
and ofc the same gun and reload.
I have complained in the past about the compression of heavy tanks, actually had a full blown debate on a german thread about moving a lot of tanks up E.G tiger 2 shouldnt be the same BR as a sherman.
or the IS3/4 shouldnt see 6.3 / 7.
The T72A actually was something i was about to bring up, the fact of hte matter is, if the T55Am1 and AMD1 go to 9.0
the Merkavas to 9.7,
the shir 2 to 10.0
the T72A should go to 9.7 and the T64B up to 10.0.
Its not one vehicle, its two for a start.
Secondly it creates greater imbalance as these tanks will get clubbed. meaning the tanks in the Br bracket around it will seem better and move up due to the score they recieve not on how they perform overall.
