to 9.7 i’d say, 9.3 for AIM-9Gs is too low in my opinion, AIM-9G on the Harriers/Jaguar GR.1 is already extremely strong
Have you used them?
Those 20mm HE belts hit like a wet fart. You’ll still often lose out against any CAS trying to head-on you or at best break even.
The XM-1GM needs its smoke launchers
I wasn’t aware there was a limit. Can you point me to the rules for this?
The rug is already covered in stinking dog muck. Throwing sone bird muck on top doesnt change anything
Air realistic battles
G.91Y
9.0->9.0
The g91 Y might clearly out accelerate and climb the other g91s, but it has a MUCH worse turn. It is also limited to 2 adens and two AA20. If anything the g91YS should have moved down.
Vehicle: J-22M1A
Mode: Air RB
Change: 9.0 → 10.3/10.7, add R-60MK
Reason: Why is the BR of this aircraft being artificially manipulated? It is already much higher in GRB due to its advanced A2G weaponry. With historical all-aspect missiles, it would be perfectly comparable to an A-10 or Su-25 type subsonic attacker aircraft.
I played both many times and honestly, had no problem with their effectiveness vs planes. What I found more lacking was shell velocity and firerate, so they feel more range limited to me more than anything, but that is compensated by their good mobility imo.
its not doing too well in arb thanks to the low amount of ammo.
if it had more i would agree.
also its closer to sagittario 2 than the ariete in performance.
its basically a sagittario with much worse firepower at 1 step lower.
ariete has a much better fm than both.
they could be 10.0 at least. including the a-7d
Which a10c cannot gain with its horrid climb rate eapecially while fully loaded.
And you are “im right because some youtuber said so”. Never claimed everyone else is wrong btw, is this your another assumption?
Sounds just like your favourite “Im right everyone else is wrong” btw. Or “Im right others are too stupid to get it and wrong”. Also its hard to trust statements based on youtube videos (from wt cc’s), sorry.
I meant, just as useless as a6 in uptiers, too bad you couldnt get the message without everything being laid out neat and tidy for you like a gourmet meal.
I only have a6e, what are you on sir?
It does exact same stuff as a6e. Slowly takes out 4-5 enemies from outside aa range 1 by 1 and rtb. And performs better than other 10.7 jets just like a6e. Neither had place at 10.7.
Are we actually serious right now? Are the devs actually that out of touch with the community that removing unique vehicles AGAIN for more copy and paste to nothing at all. Tiger 10.5, Panther II have no current equal and had a unique set up. Again, you guys remove shit and NEVER ever bring them back just fuck people out of ever getting them again all because they never played the game at that time. But Russia can be littered with fake and prototypes. This is stupid. This is bullshit. It wouldn’t be as bad if you at least kept an avenue to unlock these. But no, flat out removal and NO WAY to unlock them ever again. “Fuck you, you cant have these cool vehicles”. Thx again. Utterly stupid.
isn’t the f-5c moved up because of its fm? its missiles are 10g
sure, but it still get heavily outclassed by the wz305
That’s a good proposal, but I don’t think J-11B deserves 14.3 in this system. I don’t get how it can be better than something like F-15J(M) and at the same tier as 27SM. Also I believe you forgot 13.7
Air realistic
A2D
7.0->6.7, remove airspawn
Make the a2d able to be played as a fighter and not a bombing bot. The tech tree also has an airspawn attacker that’s also a competent fighter at 7.0 already being the f3d.
The a2d is not maneuverable compared to other props so even though it has great engine power it is limited. It does not do well against the 7.0 jets.
Gaijin modeling vehicles correctly on obvious data? impossible.
not likely
it is gaijin after all
The F-15 has 2 more missiles, not a massive advantage


