Planned Battle Rating Changes (August 2026)

Acording to this propolsal, mystere 4a have the same performance at this plane which is obviously a lie.

No harm done

This thing should not be lower than adats to begin withโ€ฆ

3 Likes

Thatโ€™s next stage, like in order to solve decompression in the entire game Iโ€™d say 16.7 is necessary, so we canโ€™t really ask for more than one increase at a time.

Agree. Itโ€™s a very solid tank with exceptional gun handling and mobility.
Itโ€™ even handles uptiers with little trouble.
Love playing that thing.

1 Like

Moving the Jumbo Pershing up to 7.0 and not the king tiger is crazy work. Ya lets just ruin the most balanced br in the game

4 Likes

The zeros going up in BR seemingly constantly is getting ridiculous and is completely unwarranted.

As I said, fakour either catches you off guard or it flies by if you expect it. Itโ€™s very effective against bad players and ineffective against experienced players. Thatโ€™s why, again, this particular vehicle is weird.

Vehicle: Premium Leopard 1 (120mm gun)
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.3 โ€”> 9.0
Reason: This vehicleโ€™s combat performance is identical to that of the Leopard 1A5; in fact, the penetration of the 120mm gunโ€™s DM13 round is even lower than that of the 105mm gunโ€™s DM33 round used by the Leopard 1A5. Therefore, its Battle Rating should match that of the Leopard 1A5.

Vehicle: Mirage 2000D-RMV

Gamemode: Air Realistic/Ground Realistic

BR Change: 12.7 โ€”> 12.0/13.0 โ€”> 12.7

Reason: RMV having same BR as F-15J is ridiculous, same BR as Mirage F1C would be fine. Itโ€™s not like Su25SM3 can use KH38 to shoot down planes in ARB.
In GRB itโ€™s already perofrming mid, you need to sacrifice AASM for a gunpod so you have a chance to deal with LDIRCM helis.

5 Likes

Gripen E should get at least 120 c8 (sweden bought them couple of years ago, basicly export version of 120 D)
F 18C (first finnish one) has no hmd or c 5s could be 14.0

GRB
AJS37
10.7โ†’11.0
With four fire-and-forget anti-tank missiles, the ability to carry anti-air missiles (albeit with a rear aspect), and even an afterburner, this is a pretty ambitious aircraft for a 10.7. I think 11.0 would be a more appropriate rating.

Both the TKX(P) and Type 90 are already significantly overtiered. They have weak darts for their BR and no meaningful armor, with their only advantage being reload speed, which is not a deciding factor in most fights.

If it would get its historically correct Engine mounted 15mm Mg 151.

The main issue with gaijinโ€™s balancing is that they cater to the players with low skill.
That results in planes with a skill floor (or premium/squadron vehicles) being undertiered while ones that are easy to use (but not necessarily good) end up going higher.
IRIAF and Su-27SM are the perfect example of that.

Gaijin should stop catering to these people and instead focus on those who are either average or slightly above average

True, that plane should be one br step below the equivalents with HMD

Problem with 1a5 is that itโ€™s not good enough for 9.3 and too good for 9.0

Then it should. By all the costs, it should not be seeing 1.0 planes.

Vehicle: Mirage 2000D

Gamemode: Air Realistic

BR Change: 12.3 โ€”> 12.0

Reason: As JH-7 at 11.7, it would be fitted for 2000D at 12.0, both 2 IRCCM missile but better air frame

5 Likes

Please fix the phantoms

1 Like