Vehicle: Chieftain MK3/MK5/MK10 Khalid
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 8.7/8.7/9.3/9.3 → 8.3/8.3/9.0/9.0
Reason: The only reason they sit at these br’s are because more skilled/better players play these tanks and in reality they are outclassed by everything at these br’s. Britain has already long suffered in this game and these chieftains are pretty much ussles when you compare them to tanks for example T-72. Just a question from me: How does Khalid and MK10 perform same way as T-72? They have worse armor (khalid) worse apfsds worse reload time (no autoloader so you need to have a good crew) worse mobility(mk10) and the T-72 is not only the reason but also Leopards that are going 0.3 br down these changes meanwhile they have much better survavibility compared to the khalid (mk10 has better turret armour but it is 10x times slower so ofc a tradeoff) they have thermals and ofc better apfsds and overall better mobility compared to the tech tree chiefs there are way more tanks at this br that just outclass chiefs but im not going mention every one of them since it would take me 10 years. And now talking about 8.7 ones and it is a suprise for me like what are they even doing at this br? No thermals awful mobility no era no aps no apfsds no ess no laser rangefinder one of the worst reload times and this equals 8.7??!?! Why im saying no era and aps? Since at 8.7 you have amxb2 brenus that can be found in French tech tree at same br with apfsds thermals aps (electro optical) but still sometimes can work better than nothing ig and a laser rangefinder. Plase make chieftains slightly better by decerassing thier br by 0.3 since im pretty much sure they definetly deserve this. Edit: + 8.7 amx has 20mm autocanon lol and pretty much same survavibility compared to chiefs.
J-22M1A
GBR 10.7 Russia was lacking an aircraft to face the vast presence of planes with AIR-TO-GROUND missiles in other countries, so in the last update they added the J-22M1A, which is performing well in its role in this BR just like the other models with the same capabilities. Now are you planning to raise the level? In less than 2 months are you going to leave the same BR 10.7 that has been lacking aircraft for years empty again? Unnecessary!
takes like 15m in test drive for me to learn em a while back
Su-25BM?
There are so many people around that constantly complain about 155mm SPHs ruining the game for them, yet for some reason the BR reductions for those SPHs actually gets support in this thread
All the planned BR reductions just make people ask for even more BR reductions, because they feel like vehicle X is similar to vehicle Y, so vehicle Y should also go down in BR
But if vehicle Y goes down in BR, it’s gonna stomp in downtiers, so the vehicles being stomped will also cause people to ask for more BR reductions
I fricken love vicious cycles like this, long live BR compression, screw the lower BRs!
I was literally thinking this. M26 has no reaspn to be at 6.7 if king tigers and is3s are going to 6.3
Vehicle: Wasp HAS.Mk.1/Wessex HU Mk.5
Gamemode: Ground Realistic
BR Change: 9.0 —> 8.7
Reason: These helis are almost unplayable on their BR and worse than any similar aircraft from other trees. The existing ATGM at 7 km cannot be used adequately due to the limited zoom on these helicopters. They’re also neither extremely agile nor maneuverable. They would be better at BR 8.7, where they would fit into the existing vehicle setup and would not demonstrate any significant effectiveness.
ALSO
Please change the amount of experience points required to level up helicopters. The current model requires unreasonable values — except for first/second helicopters, the rest simply require exponentially higher amounts of experience. It’s unclear why a 9.0 helicopter somehow needs to gain 250++k exp and how people should earn it.
I know, your average player isn’t going to bother with that though
yeah we should just speed up the process and make 2.0 the max br
you are so weirdly fixated on a text you can’t easily understand for some reason even though the core beliefs are the same, like what?
what is it?
They should have gone up and they should have introduced an actual artillery mechanic.
Just use the existing mini map. Add a scatter value and some aiming mechanics.
Then move them up so they can only primarily function in a support fire role. With said mechanics, anyone wanting to engage in support would have to go through a learning curve to prevent it being OP.
A formidable aircraft and particularly very much desired by me, but unfortunately it is a limited-access plane compared to the examples present in other nations.
AMX A-1A (ITA) GR BR 11.3 → 10.7, maybe even 10.3
subsonic striker jet with only 6 laser gbu12-ish bombs fights against pantsirs at worst and tors at best. On same BR in other nations we have su25t/su39, mirage 2000D-R1, Hawk 200 RDA, and on lesser BR we already have 4 or even 6 FnF Mavericks, while on this we only have laser gbus even without gnss
Or just add him ability to carry more powerful weaponry
Yes
No, not only is that a terrible idea because of heavy reliance on luck, it’s also not even feasible on most maps
To do proper artillery fire you need much larger maps, as the minimum range for that is huge
Only one (The worst version) KT and IS-2 mod 44 are going to 6.3.
The fact is the KT received few nefs like movility and ammo in the turret meanwhile the IS-2 mod. 44 received a huge armor boost before his BR change and now he go back to 6.3 retaining that buff.
But the allies fanboys are to busy only complaining about germany buffs “cuz typical allies mains germany hate”
Vehicle: MiG-29N
Gamemode: Air Realistic
BR Change: 13.3 —> 13.0
Reason: This is the weakest aircraft technically at its BR – it lacks adequate electronics, its maneuverability is far from optimal for its BR, and its missiles (we’re talking about the ARH-missiles) aren’t the best either. Its competitors at 13.0 either have better maneuverability, better electronics, or more missiles/better quality of them. I believe that lowering its BR won’t make it an OP-aircraft, especially given the significant compression at those BRs.
The MiG-29G and MiG-29 (9-13) are at 13.0 without R-77s, why would the 29N with R-77s be at the same BR?
except it would.
Think about the 13.0 aircraft with Fox-3 missiles
The MiG-29N is fast, relatively agile (sure its not great but nor is it awful) with enough countermeasures (barely)
And you want the N at the same BR as the 29 9-13 and 29G which are identical to you but you have 6 R-77s instead of 2 R-27s and 4 R-73s
Where ch-ri back to 5.0 😠😠😠😠😠😠