G-lock will stop you partway through a turn if you attempt to sustain it, that’s what I mean by that, but yeah, other than that, yes.
Yes, I just don’t want people to get confused
1 Like
People today are so easy to get confused.
I heard multiple times people saying that they need expert/ace crews in order to turn better…
1 Like
Good, kinda tired tho, getting to go home early today. 🥳
I’m sorry, what? This got flagged?
1 Like
Ah yes, the “direct official wiki”! The most credible source!
1 Like
Imho you mix irl and wt. They are just loosely connected.
Based on the hard cut VE day in May '45 there were just 2 potential adversaries: The few Meteors F.3 and the few YP-80s - both were slower and had lower critical (controllable at high speed) and tactical (ability to bring guns on target) mach numbers.
There were no other jets.
I described this in another thread :
Me 262 A-1 interceptor spawn - #90 by Uncle_J_Wick
Me 262 A-1 interceptor spawn - #86 by Uncle_J_Wick
So if you face opponents which are faster (decisive) or turn better (not decisive) it is simply based on this effect:
…which boils down that you can pimp up your ride with more available forward trust - even if your ride is not really suited for high speed.
So the Meteors / P-80s were based on their design inferior - the effects you might notice or suffer were all engine related - as the increase in trust was able to compensate the conceptual disadvantage of straight wings and missing high speed research.
And these solely engine related avantages play a role in your game experience - as the increase in engine power happened after VE day. In o other words: If you want to have a pleasant Me 262 game play experience, you might ask for an adjustment of BRs which disables the current set-ups - or you ask for the implementation of Me 262 versions / prototypes like this one:
The USSR jets irl were before the MiG -15 era not competitive - just based on missing research efforts and lack of engines. Thanks to the UK they got access to the the RR jet engine which made the Ta-183 copy (wehraboos usually claim this) aka as MiG-15 a success.
If you see a non-WW2 combat P-51 D-30 at 5.0 or a non WW2 combat P-51 H-5 at BR 6.3 you might get the idea, that if we assume that the BR of 7.0 for a 1944 production aircraft like the Me 262 A-1a is correct, we just see that the whole BR setting policy of gaijin follows mainly economic goals.
1 Like