You can nerf the cost reduction, I’m not saying that the reduction isn’t too powerful right now.
The only reason why I would agree with that is that it is annoying to be on the team with 8 SPAAs that can’t do anything. From a CAS v SPAA point of view, there is no reason to limit the amount of SPAA on the field.
Why the hell would anti air need a survivability nerf?
Yak-130 is incredibly fun to play as a low alt attacker with the TV kab500s.
But yeah low alt strafing runs can be effective against systems with close range dead zones like Tors/OSA or my once beloved stormer HVM. Feels great too.
They really butchered our boy
You’re genuinely so confused lol. I called out your J-16 20+ FnF comment. Nothing else. I don’t care where they put the J-16 ill still use it and ill still keep playing at the max available BR is as ive done for the past 3 years. I have quite literally not played a lower BR in years.
Used to be one of the most enjoyable SPAA (minus the phase through bug) a good few years ago. Butchered by the weather system and nerfs to the IR radar on top of multiple nerfs to the starstreak itself.
Got an entire folder full of hatemail I received from swatting CAS when it was at its prime.
2 Likes
it does not have 20+ fnf you happy cause I said this 10 min ago what a flex that has no correlation whatsoever that we are talking about the balance and BR of CAS and AA relations keep using your J-16 I don’t have an issue with it just don’t try to act like the underdogs to f15E cause its pretty equal
From a CAS v SPAA point of view, there is no reason to limit the amount of SPAA on the field.
That would be true for any other mode than GROUND battles. GRB players expect to fight GROUND vehicles on GROUND. And I personally prefer my enemy being actually within my reach and not somwhere in stratosphere or AFKing at base. That’s why I wanna see limit on both SPAAs and CAS.
Why the hell would anti air need a survivability nerf?
Dude have you seen what these shitboxes can survive? No truck should be allowed to survive direct tank round hit or multiple plane cannon hits.
I’d love to see where ive said anything about it being an underdog or whatever?
I have infact not even shared my opinion on it a single time you seem to have leaped to the conclusion that I think its underpowered or something similar. I just called out your inability to count.
Im not even taking part in this thread since it doesn’t affect me in any way. Im just here because of your mental gymnastics.
so saying J-16 has 20+ Fnf is not mental gymnastics wth? that’s just a what I said because you cut of the quote of me also putting f15E in the same sentence I am NOT sorry for saying it
0 correlation and an attempt to derail this thread to you complaining about a 20+ statement you wouldn’t be here if you didn’t care all that much
you would also have to scroll down and read what I said and other post in this thread to find out I said 20+ fnf
I see no problem there, if your enemy doesn’t contend for the objectives, you win. It’s no different than having your enemies just leave the game.
- That’s not limited to SPAA
- If they can’t fight back, their survivability doesn’t help them
What BR is this even about? Pre-SAM BRs?
Easy solution. learn to write, and dont make bogus claims and especially dont leap to whatever insane conclusions you got to.
Why even put the J-16 together with the F-15E in your original 20 fnf comment since it literally has nothing close to that.
Im glad the J-16 is some sort of Boogie man to you
so its okay to make Grammer mistakes but only when you do it please just stop you said you aren’t caring about this but here’s what you did:
typed in :forum.warthunder .com
pressed game discussion categories
pressed this polll
scrolled down read my 20 fnf claim
replied to it
and kept replying about it after because you wont let it slide
totally not caring about the BR changes
I haven’t mentioned any grammer mistakes?. I make plenty of mistakes as english isnt my first, second or third language. And a missing space between words isnt a Grammer mistake either.
The leant to write was meant for how you formulate what you write.
We’re literally only here atm because you jumped to some random “china main” conclusions instead of just correcting your claim or saying you missremebered the amout or somthing along those lines.
All of this has been completely avoidable but you jumped the gun on starting to acuse me of random stuff I haven’t even mentioned.
1 Like
your a Chinese main bro you have like 5k games just in Chinese tanks alone?
holy victom cope
Again skipped the point entirely
if your enemy doesn’t contend for the objectives, you win
Victory in this game doesn’t really mean anything and is not worth anything. Kills, on the other hand, do. Besides Im playing ACTION games to have some ACTION, not to play driving-and-capturing point simulator.
- That’s not limited to SPAA
My point still stands.
- If they can’t fight back, their survivability doesn’t help them
Do you really think tanks should waste more than one round to kill a shitbox?
What BR is this even about? Pre-SAM BRs?
Insane survivability issue applies to all of them and turns critical when it comes to SPAAs that can effectively fight other ground vehicles.
you cannot judge my Grammer of saying f15E and J-16 20+ fnf and expect me to care about your 3rd language they are in the same sentence so I can say that especially since I said f15E first