Do you actually speak English? You can clearly see what I meant.
Trouble is with fantasy stuff is how does anybody know what it can or can’t absorb? If you elected to take the whole game with a pinch of salt and accept these vehicles then you have to ride with that.
279 has never absorbed APFSDS, I should know cause I fight & own it.
I primarily used HEATFS against them, but 279 has been nerfed so many times I now use APFSDS against them.
Strf 9040C can pen anything frontally too I guess.
Both of which are off-topic, which you started with that post.
Unless it was an april fools event, but dumbed down to WWII?
I would love to be Eddie Rickenbacker or the Red Baron WW1 planes would be great.
well, we have naval vehicles that old in game already, and frankly tanks of that era were almost all exclusively infantry support and very little head to head combat for the most part, so not too logical. But I can see a dedicated section for the WW I planes maybe . . separate from what we have in game already most likely. lol, but I just threw that in as most of the vehicles you are talking would seem to be WW II or newer anyway, many MUCH newer . . . just being a minch is all . . lol. And sadly . . April Fool’s Day events have been for testing and not really aimed at being “fun” for a long while anyway . . . sadly
Could be a solution to fill gaps and solve balance issues. Could be also the opposite. And here we have our biggest problem … the snail + could = prepare for impact.
Or multicrew bombers *dreamin
I saw a YT short of the 279 tanking APFSDS.
The real definition of a “paper” plane. One of the last things I’m a bit proud of as a former german …
Gaijin would force you to spade a better tissue paper upgrade and thicker string lol
I have always thought the multi crew bombers and some tanks would be very exciting to try, but so much work . . . hard to see it happening, but we can always hope. Playing some old Battlefield 1 during beta and getting to ride in a tank as a machine gunner was awesome . . . we need that kinda stuff in WT me thinks
Bad shot placement by the APFSDS user then.
Chieftain Mk10’s turret is the strongest 9.X turret in the game, so it’s possible you can get people to bounce off the tank with bad shot placement.
I’m not talking about the Mk10, I’m talking about the 279
Ships only
No, it can go.
I will clarify that as far as I am concerned - If at least one fully functional protoype was built and tested, it can qualify provided we have more than adequate documentation regarding it’s capabilities.
Anything short of that does not qualify and should be removed.
Maybe ships only.
My line is drawn at post treaty ships. Where if they weren’t finished then the tech tree should move onto cold war, because it takes away from the accomplishments that were the Iowa and Yamato. The Yamato in particular should be the “Oh shit!” Moment for players going against it.
Rather then it just being average because ships that were never going to be completed in the first place are being added with paper statistics.
Will we eventually make it to paper tanks? Maybe, but we aren’t there yet. But it seems like the Standard Panzer E-series issue keeps coming back because people are upset they can’t get Tiger 10.5cm, Panther II, and Anti-air Panther.
The O-I though would be cool to see as one of the iterations that it’s debated that we’re possible to have been constructed.
We’ll sooner or later become like World of Tanks, do you want that? I dont, so dont add paper tanks.
I’m alright with paper vehicles/unfinished projects as long as it’s not too crazy. Mainly stuff that are similar or can be based off of existing vehicles.
I wanna see CXP-1001 or project-1006 warship someday.
