just like bmpt，Afterwards gaijin will move it, then pretend it doesn’t exist, and then continue to release a new Russian brain-dead vehicle in the next version.
i think the only wrong thing here is u
No, I’m referring to the fragmentation damage.
just what i said, the new M version is not better in that area, nor in other one except top speed and maneuverability.
it’s basically a rocket-propelled APFSDS (like the LOSAT’s ATGMs), it does low damage compaired to the original missile.
the original is way deadlier while the new one is way harder to dodge.
1 Like
no ，he is right
The extra AHEAD pre-fragmented section of the 95ya6m directly provides 3,500 fragments, with a fragment range of 200 metres, single fragment penetration of 25, damage 20, and single-shot fragment damage of 70,000. The fragment quantity coefficient is directly set to 1 (Figure 1).
What level is 20 points of kinetic damage? According to the in-game kinetic-damage conversion table (Figure 2), 20 points of damage corresponds to 45 kJ of kinetic energy, which is already at the level of a 20mm gun. Assuming all pre-fragments fully inherit the missile’s maximum speed of 1,700 mps, in order to produce 45 kJ of kinetic energy, the mass of a single fragment would need to be around 30 grams. 30 grams, 3,500 fragments—this is already very inconsistent.
Comparing with a normal high-explosive fragment warhead: the theoretical fragment count of the 95ya6 is 2,560, fragment theoretical penetration 8mm, damage 14.2, radius 45.9 m. Since the total quantity coefficient for the generic air-defence missile fragment template is only 0.505, even using parameters from the sector with maximum side energy (1.5 times radius, 1.5 times damage) to estimate the total damage of all fragments, it only reaches 27,600 damage, radius 69 m, penetration 12mm.
In terms of fragment damage projection, one 95ya6m round is much stronger than two older rounds, and even Baumu (total fragment damage 56,812) is far from its match.
Theoretically, remote detonation at 50 metres is not ideal for maximising fragment power, but because the fragment range reaches 200 metres, fragments can still retain most of their damage and penetration when reaching the aircraft, meaning the values are very sufficient.
Additionally, with 50 metres plus a maximum fragment cone angle of 20 degrees, when the fragment cloud reaches the aircraft, it effectively achieves an 18-metre damage radius (50×tan20°). Even if manually fired inaccurately, it is sufficient most of the time to shred a fixed-wing aircraft.
4 Likes
As stated already, please use existing threads:
1 Like
You didn’t get what I meant. According to the unpacked data, the new missile has a higher number of fragments because it uses directional fragmentation. Low damage is wrong.
i’m still pretty sure it’s way deadlier a proxy fuze with HE warhead than limited AHEAD.
would u mind comparing both missiles in different scenarios to check it out?
This was written by the player responsible for unpacking, so it has been translated and may contain many inaccurate or incorrect name translations. You just need to know that the actual damage effect of this item is better than the Buk.
we aren’t talking about the BUK here.
Especially those who sit at helipad the entire match launching missiles? Tank players sure enjoy that kind of gameplay
2 Likes
Of crouse.
Yes, but its damage is even higher than that of a missile as thick as the Buk’s. Don’t you think that’s weird
well, BUK’s missile are 6 times bigger and they are slower, that explains a lot, buddy.
slower the missile, worse the damage, same thing for aircrafts: higher ur speed, higher the range u can launch ur missiles.
I have already written that the total mass of the prefabricated fragments of the new missile (105kg) has far exceeded the total mass of the warhead (32.5kg), and it is obvious that Russia does not need to comply with the law of conservation of mass. Under this Russian mass-energy conversion miracle, only two 95ya6 missiles hitting the same spot could match the peripheral destructive effect of a single 95ya6m, even a buk that is much better than the 95ya6 cannot match the 95ya6m.
1 Like
i honestly don’t feel like the BUK is better in any way than the Pantsir-S1 with it’s 95Ya6.
non-erectal launcher + heavy missiles + ez to multipath makes it a bad SPAA.
Did you misunderstand something? I’m saying the new Pantsir missile is even more powerful than the Buk in terms of damage.
3 Likes
did u minsunderstand something? i just explained u why the BUK has weaker missiles than the new Pantsir as u said they’re.
why are you even talking in here? you don’t play top tier ground…