Massive braincell loss
If it means anything I play on a friend’s account when I’m not grinding my own account. France is pretty much not worth grinding outside of top tier air.
I can research rank VII whenever I want but have no desire to since I know what it’s like.
Buying premium tanks =/= having top tier
So you don’t have an argument?
My guy coming up with entire essays in his head just to try and invalidate me at this point
That’s not what I said, I said it’s a positive of the Type 10 over the Leclerc.
It’s not “slightly” worse, it’s noticeably worse.
Everything not being a road sprint was something I already pointed out with acceleration being far more important.
Flavour sure, but they’re very bad options. Type 93 APFSDS is very long in tooth at this point and the Type 89s ATGMs are almost unusable in most War Thunder ranges due to them not launching as much as falling out of the launcher.
They’re much worse than the competition, that makes them bad.
The same is true for the Type 10, the entire floor is a fuel tank and you want more than 15 rounds of ammo that means hull stowage
Perfect? It’s not even good. The Arietes are closer to actively griefing your own team than perfect.
They don’t even have a top tier SPAA either
LWS is more useful for Helicopters more than anything else.
Implying you do.
then why are you replying
This is just going in circles.
Japan at least has the Type 89 and Type 16. Missiles in general are pretty bad as well. Somehow only Russia and Sweden have usable missiles.
Which again, saying as if the Type 10 has a worse mobility doesn’t mean it’s unplayable. It can still get around to where it needs to go. They both are considered among the more mobile MBTs.
Restating that the Ariete isn’t a good tank is also going nowhere. It’s got good HP/T and DM53.
Italy has the Freccia and Centauro 120. Now they’re asking for the Centauro 2 and Leopard 2A7HU.
SPAA is probably the only area that I’ll admit that France is doing the best in outside of the USSR and China. The ITO is perfectly fine at countering most that it encounters.
Both nations having LWS means that they’re actually situationally aware more then the Leclerc. Which France only has the Leclerc. LWS has saved me a good amount of times already as well against tanks, especially at long ranges.
This is bringing you absolutely no where and just makes me want to write you off as an idiot more.
What does this even mean?
I’ve played the Leclerc’s alongside the Type 10s.
It’s a perfectly fine tank in comparison, it can also use buffs along with the Leclerc which I’m not arguing against.
This is giving me a headache and I don’t want to stay here for hours.
Can we just agree to disagree instead of slowly insulting each other more and more?
The Type 10s are not among the most mobile MBTs, that’s the point. People are just assuming it is because of the Type 90. It’s much slower than the BVM, Leo 2 and ZTZ99A.
I’m having to restate things because you’re ignoring it. “not unplayable” is not a compliment, and I don’t see how this makes Italy on par with France which is the crux of the issue here.
k? The Freccia/Cent aren’t as good as having actual MBTs (and an SPAA) at top tier though
sure why not
I have anterograde amnesia due to an injury in my youth. Every day I learn to live again in many things.
Every day I learn how to shoot planes in this game again. It’s so exciting. hehe.
Young man, write down in your smartphone what is in which bag. This will not correct the fleeting nature of life, but there will be less wasted food. hehe.
2 Likes
Man gets to play games for the first time all the time.
Certainly a positive outlook for a bad situation.
2 Likes
During the liberation war of bangladesh my father once witnessed a M24 chaffee get hit by a T-55’s shell. He said the round went through the whole tank and it landed a kilometer away. It made two huge holes in the chaffee.
Something must be done with the 16 vs 16 in air top tier battles
Should be 10 vs 10 max
2 Likes
just wait for nothing to change and 32 players start launching AMRAAMs at each other
1 Like
is it just me or is stock grinding the MiG-29G now a lot harder than the 9.12A was to stock grind?
my K/D on the 9.12A was 0.5, now on the 29G its 0.3
winrate was 55% on the 9.12A and it’s now 44% on the G
When did you grind the original
before SMT came out
I tried it today too and it really feels a lot more agile than the 29G although I haven’t spaded that one
The russian base 29 is heavier then the G but their shouldn’t really be a difference
can’t be that much heavier
taking R-60MK instead of R-73E probably revokes the weight advantage