It was wired for AIM-9L tho so using the Mike isn’t limited. RB71 was advertised as possible armament for JAS39A variant. Rest you said is accurate.
For A2G it should only have RB75, m/70 and m/71 iirc.
It was wired for AIM-9L tho so using the Mike isn’t limited. RB71 was advertised as possible armament for JAS39A variant. Rest you said is accurate.
For A2G it should only have RB75, m/70 and m/71 iirc.
idc im a pilot, im still concerned why they believe this thing should get 40 year old thermals when the russian tanks from the time get modern ones
The dev server only just launched today, I am pretty sure there are plenty of bugs and errors
and that would’ve been fine for an A
Oh boy tell me about it.
Yeah ik. Perfect for 11.7/12.0 with AIM-9L only instead of AIM-9M.
So, the J39A that sounds like it’s closer to the C is a problem.
But the perfectly functional tank that is only missing better generation thermals is also just as big of a problem?
the problem isn’t that we got it the problem js that they can literally change nothing and call it C
Im not crying here im just confused about their choices
again I do not at all care about tanks
it’s just the only new vehicle I can test drive rn
Again, the plane that is somewhere between the J39A and C is a problem only because of it’s name.
Then the 122B+ which you both have no plan on using and is only a problem because of the thermal sight.
You should be happy with what you’re getting and not the technicalities behind them. Everyone else except Russia has a much greater reason to complain.
Because Sweden will still be as strong as it was in the current meta as it will be in the new one.
There is a topic of adding Washington, D.C. as a map on the Russian forms.
I got to see what else I can find even if I’m just using Google translate.
This can only mean one thing…
invasion!
Doesn’t look too different from ours.
CF-18 for UK
Skink for the US
KF-14 for Germany
just odd suggestions and the fact there suggestions seem to auto close after some time.
Wow, I’ve found people talking about how badly the UK is treated in-game over there. Interesting place but Uh— Google translate is dying on me so I’m going to stop there.
what did you eat today?anything special?
I will scream if we get skink instead of the 6 .50s chaffee
Not even worth trying
Just enjoy the salt
The only difference between the A and C other then the guided bombs is a RWR and HMD
So the difference between the f4j and f4s but performance should be the same
So not alot
I think they are saving the Swedish Gripen C for AMRAAMS
RWR difference is quite significant tho. Iirc it doesn’t get launch warnings on the A variant and has limited lock angles.
Yeah ive seen the Gripen A rwr is quite bad in the dev
If they wanted to save the C for AMRAAMS do a early
Actually that wouldn’t work as the Gripen C went on to use IRIS-T
C also mounted RB74 in service