10 nice
Germany can get at least 4 F/A-18 by there own means they don’t need the Swiss
1 Like
Right here on the belly, it’s a sighting container. I just don’t remember that the Shvetsrats had GBUS
1 Like
For the F-20, the branch is controversial, it doesn’t seem to be an attack aircraft.
You can add the Mig-29GT as a promotional or premium.
Before F4F ICE there will be 1 more incomprehensible F4F Norm 91J of the 90s. At the same time, there is a black fairing, which means it is not ICE
And so a very cool match. Although I wouldn’t mind seeing ASSTA 2.0, 2.1, 3.0, 3.1 after the Tornado
For fun, I could also draw a Su-27, It would be possible to add after the Mig-29 or a series of Su aircraft
1 Like
don’t forget F-15 and F/A-18 if you’re including the F-20
2 Likes
hehehe
There is no point to adding ASSTA 2.0, 2.1 or 3.0, only the 3.1 would really make sense
Well we can call it the F-4FJ for now
I personally don’t think adding every little ASSTA version is necessary, maybe just a 3.1 or a 2.1 and a 3.1
or F4F IC
1 Like
Mmmm, mach 0.94 max speed.
https://img-forum-wt-com.cdn.gaijin.net/original/3X/3/9/39eb03ae9a6b9d5be5a115e0310b1b523a21ac6c.gif
And
at that point the extra missiles are unnecessary
in game you’ll never use 10 AMRAAMs and IRL I don’t think so either
this is just a Wealth flex from the Swiss
2 Likes
We probably wouldn’t even get such loadout options
If you’ve ever used Fox-3s (Like Aim-54) then you’d know there’s no such thing as “too many”.
You simply fire and forget, spam the missiles out until you’re dry.
Maybe in terms of gameplay and balacing, but never due to lack of demand.
1 Like
From a balance (and realism) perspective there definitely is such a thing as too many missiles
I can see F-18s with double pylons being added at higher tiers in the future