Ah so Switzerland can go ether in he French tree or the Italian one then
No, because they originally had officially German)
But the official language of America is English.
See the problem using the language as a reason
italy would be funny, give the L to both germany and french, good that wont be possible since they already got Hungary, that is the thing Hungary would have been the perfect german sub tree since it doesnt realy have anything to do with italy either, and turkey would ahve been a better italy sub tree seeing how their helicopters are already in the tree as well
Before the advent of the United States, there was no official language there at all; they used different ones, since the country consisted of immigrants
Before the that the Swiss was under the control of the holy roman empire which was Austria. So an independent Alpine tree when ?
For me it’s not about C&P (since we have all vs all games afterall) but about origin of the vehicle. Not in country of origin sense but more about reasoning of its existence in said tt.
Take F/A-18C in Germany for example. We can add it to the tt because it was trailed / tested / considered but going by this logic we could have F/A-18C in literally every tt in game because everyone considered it at some point. Same goes for other jets like F-16A/C or F-14A or even F-15A/C/E/EX etc.
What we should do is add Swiss F/A-18C or other comparable jet from better fitting nation to Germany. It makes sense from historical perspective and fills the gap without making us speculate about some non-existant specifications of some brochure vehicle. Same can be done with other nations like UK (Canadian CF-18), Japan (Thai F-16A Block 15 OCU), Sweden (Finnish F/A-18C) etc.
Adding vehicles solely on the fact that they’re used by company based in said country should also be avoided because we’d und up in the same situation as mentioned above.
Not actually true they have no official language but they all speak English mostly
Well most misuse English anyway :(
Sorry, of course, but what about the T-90 in UK and the future in the USA (If they add it), T-80 in Sweden, Abrams in China? It seems to me that this is already happening, and there is no point in denying it
Let’s switch to Russian then or, um, Spanish? :0
well thats gonna happen either way , taiwanese abrams gonna be added to the tree sooner then later and i am gonna love to watch that chaos unfold
Are we waiting for the discovery of secret technologies?
(This is a joke, don’t do it)
The worst part is that it’s an export M1A2 SEPv3.
what they meant is the tree is full. They can’t have another line (Sub tree or otherwise add). this was on the topic of SA air.
I agree. I could see most of those added as a new tree.
How does it perform against the p51h? It’s currently the only reason I want to grind britain
I’m not denying it. What I mean is that reasoning behind these additions is different since they’re actual vehicles used by these countries (operator countries) instead being made-up by gaijin based on some advertisement or some other speculations.
To be clear I don’t agree with F-16AJ specifically (should be swapped to something that existed) and I don’t fully agree with T-80U implementation for Sweden (it could’ve been added with more visual differences for example)
T-90S for UK isn’t the best addition but it also has its reasoning…
You see it’s all about that reasoning and origin of existence in said tt. Also we can’t get mad for export-successfull vehicles being added to other tech trees. That’s just how it is with them and we shouldn’t limit them only to country of origin because otherwise we would have only US F-4 Phantoms in the game for example.
Also about that M1 for China - I don’t mind. If they used it they definitely should get it at some point. Same with Mirage 2000EI for Taiwan. Taiwan is still China and they should be represented in the game.
US is already upgrading their M1A2 SEPv3 with Trophy and some other stuff. In the end it’s only a single Abrams outside US vs whole fleet of comparable and better M1s in US.

