Hopefully one day we might see the EPAWSS now that the FM buff is gone.
3 Likes
Hi, can we have GBU53 with IR seeker introduced to F15E and 18E? Since the spice250 has been added for months and other nations received it in this major update as well. By using IR mode the GBU53 and spice250 is basically exactly same thing.
now isnt all of that enough precedent for AMBER too?
because we have the actual mockups, and patents for it unlike those other ones in game
1 Like
if anything SPICE will be better in game because GBU-53 has a HEAT warhead, which is much less reliable in game
According to everything I’ve found on stormbreaker, it has a duel purpose warhead with a blast fragmentation and HEAT warhead. Idk how true that is, but it seams feasible considering how new the bomb is.
This is from raytheon and it states the same thing. A multi purpose warhead.
2 Likes
yes but like other dual purpose warheads in game (eg. JAGM) it will probably be modeled as HEAT
Fair.
With MRML we have proof of rewiring the pylons and the new databuses, which would have allowed its use. We don’t have that for the amber racks. It would be extremely hard to prove those.
true, but its not like that has been proven for other pylons being added
Again, we have proof of rewiring and new databuses there that are compatible with MRML. We don’t have that for Amber racks. Unless you mean stuff like the Su-30SM twin racks?
for the EX, can the LEGION pod go on the dedicated pod hardpoint and not centerline like the F-15C so we can take a drop tank with full 16 missile + LEGION loadout?
That is an excellent question, I haven’t seen any testing of the legion pod on the EX. I don’t see why it wouldn’t work if they WANTED to though
1 Like
yeah, we dont have that for stuff like the flanker twin racks or the EFT twin racks
ideally they let us use Tiger Eyes if LEGION is centerline only, but since its an export thing afaik im not sure if we can bring them even though they have been on F-15SA’s and QA’s
Rewiring and databuses aren’t needed and all it needs is a single MIL-STD-1760 connection.
The BRU-61/A rack uses that interface AFAIK.
So the F-15E should technically have the capability idk about the F-15C
patent of the MIL-STD-1760 citing the BRU-61/A
US9916277B2 - Translation of universal armament interface (UAI) to military standard (mil-std-1760) messaging interface - Google Patents
[ 0019 ] The embodiment described herein employs a Multiple Advanced Missile and Bomb Ejection Rack ( AMBER ) Carriage System which divides an existing standard electrical / mechanical interface at an aircraft pylon for communication with multiple AA or AG store types utilizing on - board carriage avionics . This requires no physical mechanical or electrical modification / retrofit to existing aircraft interfaces.
https://patentimages.storage.googleapis.com/b1/2d/11/02c66154a2edc3/US20170259919A1.pdf
not like any of this matters it got gaijin’d
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/w2MMzjNGpmkv
Depends on what side of the bed the devs wake up on that day
Yeah I’m not sure if the C has that connection there, there would be no need to since IRL it had no smart A2G. Gaijin just invented all of that lol
Are there any methods to enhance the AIM120C? Or add a BOL pod to the FA18E? And there’s GBU53B.
The current American air combat technology tree is a bit disappointing : (
they denied the bug report from General Lee
Be ready to be disappointed till 5th gen are added if AMRAAMS are not fixed or aim 9x is not added. I fully expect them to mess up AIM 120D also just like they did to AIM 120C
4 Likes