NF-5A on the Leviathan dev server

NF-5A

The NF-5A will be coming to War Thunder in the upcoming major patch “Leviathans” as a pre-order premium pack vehicle. This Discussion is an attempt at consolidating all known bug reports on this specific vehicle to see what should and shouldn’t be on the final in-game vehicle.

Table of Contents

Earlier related discission pages

Suggestion post

Community post

As-it-stands state

image

image

Things to note

  • AIM-9N instead of AIM-9P
  • 60x normal and 30x large countermeasures
  • 20 mm M39A3 x2 with 560 rounds total
  • Engine: 2x General Electric J-85-CAN-15 (13,01 kN each) with afterburner (19 kN each):image

Bug Reports - ongoing

Flight model

Cockpit

Armament

Missing

Table of armaments, as confirmed with pictures of in-service planes AND the flight manual

Armament

Canadair NF-5A
Loadouts
Main gun 2x M39A2 20mm (560 rounds)
Pylons Wingtip left (9) Outer wing left (8) Inner wing left (6) Fuselage (5) Inner wing right (4) Outer wing right (2) Wingtip right (1)
reference AIM-9P AIM-9P
reference Mk.82 500lb Snake-eye High Drag Mk.82 500lb Snake-eye High Drag
reference Mk.82 500lb Snake-eye LowDrag Mk.82 500lb Snake-eye Low Drag
reference Training rocket pod (4x FFAR)
reference DIAS camera + Training rocket pod (4x FFAR)
reference DIAS camera
reference LAU-51 (19x FFAR) LAU-51 (19x FFAR)
reference LAU-3A (19x FFAR) LAU-3A (19x FFAR)
reference 600 lbs BL755 cluster bomb 600 lbs BL755 cluster bomb 600 lbs BL755 cluster bomb
reference External fuel tank External fuel tank External fuel tank External fuel tank External fuel tank

Bug Reports - accepted/not-a-bug/implemented

Flight model

Cockpit

Armament

Sources

Flight model

Engines

image

Cockpit

Instrumenten paneel Nederlandse NF-5A (met moving map display)

image
image
image



Armament

Armament according to the manual

10 Likes

The first Bug report is out:

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Nzk4S6xkek4f

regarding the wrong valuas of the thrust of the General Electric J-85-CAN-15 engines.

Edit: Denied as not-a-bug with:

The manual states Engine stand thrust, but the game uses thrust of the installed engine.

Good idea to have a post like this!

Regarding the engine, it is stated that it is for an uninstalled engine. So they are going to defend its current thrust as correct, have been the same procedure with the other F-5’s.

Do you know what kind of sight is dsiplayed in those diagrams?

A standard Northrop non-computing gunsight but replaced the Sperry gyro heading and reference system with a Bendix attitude and heading reference system, at least according to what I’ve read.

2 Likes

That’s weird, as all Dutch sources use the values for the uninstalled engine.

1 Like

Yeah they are rated on mounts outside the aircraft, and then gaijin can decide the amount of channel losses thenselves. For example, the F-5A using the J85-13 engine have less thrust than the G.91Y using the same engines.

Second new bug report

[Dev] NF-5A - Missing ‘R/B D’: “Rocket and Bomb Dispenser”: Community Bug Reporting System

1 Like

wait is this pre-order pack is a scam coz like 70USD just for a f-5A with more CM only
why does it so expensive
and you said ECM was equipped, how is it exactly

Please rephrase your question.

I didn’t have anything to do with pricing. The pricing is based upon the Rank of a vehicle. All rank 7 planes are 69.99 GJN. Take it up with Gaijin’s marketing department.

The NF-5A is not an F-5A.

The NF-5A has a lot more differences than ‘just more countermeasures’.

The ECM pod is installed right above the engines and those triangular boxes on the top left and right on the sides of the engines.

Please read the articles above. You’ll find answers to most, if not all, of your questions…

10.3 with AIM-9N is wild surely it’s a mistake

Thank you for your reply and answers
I dont think i need to rephase my questuon but anyway
I just realise that im comparing its stats cards to a F5E, seems it should be better then a regular F5A?Im not sure, i haven’t check yet
But as far as i concern, does the ECM we’re talking here is same as the one on Su39?
Thanks

That’s correct! The NF-5A is an improvement on the CF-5A, which in turn is the Canadian Canadair licence produced variant of the Northrop F-5A. The F-5E is based on the improvements introduced on the NF-5A, such as the cockpit, canopy, ECM, engines, etc.

No it’s not, as far as I know it’s mostly the RWR system paired with countermeasure pods. This system is from the 1980s. As can be read in my post:

I could see it going up in BR for Ground Realistic Battles. As for now on the dev server it’s definitely 10.7 in Air Realistic Battles, as can be seen in the first picture of this thread.

denied

We don’t know what to do about that, the values used by Gaijin are absent in any Government or Military documents. The bug-reported values are the only ones present in any documentation and tests.

i think they want exact value on installed engine since mounting and normal air enviroment would give different thrust value
but most modern aircraft doesnt suffer alot from this
usually the installed engine would maybe have 1-5% less thrust
“channel loss” is informerly used to describe this although its not official(but gaijin devs/mods use this)
i say they should buff it closer to the value on bench test
from what i research older jet has much higher CL(around 10-25%, condition dependant) than modern jets(around 1-5%, condition dependant)

also idk how gaijin calculate thrust of installed engine
i think they just made up numbers to balance it out tbh

Ah, that makes more sense. I’d still think it should be 11.0 in ARB as it seems to be more akin to the F-5E than A/C, but at least it’s not 10.3

By the way, do you know where the additional 30 large cal CMs are mounted?

I don’t, but I am aware of the ALE-40(N) mount: 60 chaff/flare.

ALE-40(N). This is a special variant designed for the Royal Netherlands NF-5 and consists of a CCU(cockpit control unit), chaff/ flare programmer, and two dispensers. It is skin mounted on the aft fuselage. A similar installation was used on the F-104. (Compared to the normal US F-5E ALE-40(V) dispensers, that could only launch 30 normal flares, 15 on each side.)

However, later manuals do mention the additional 30 large-calibre flare countermeasures. I have not yet seen what that installment was called, but is was located near the root of the tail. As far as I know, the ALE-40(N) dispensers (which were further upgraded in their last phase) are just larger than their counterparts on the F-5E, which would explain the additional 30 large countermeasures.

Some illustration of the normal ALE-40(N) (clearly 10x3 layout):
disp1
disp17
disp2

479cecc4-afcc-8ff2-e879-a69449fde27e

An example of the old 5x3 (large calibre) flare layout:

1 Like

According to this website, the 6x3 is flares and the 10x3 is for chaff! AN/ALE-40 chaff dispenser

Weird if the additional CMs doesnt have a physical origin…