I have been searching finnish armored groups journals and additional testing groups
and the only reference ive seen to this thing was a mention of the gun being trialled then replaced.
Mainly looking for the names of Tank commanders but so far i only have the name for Nikki commander.
Finnish T-34/76, 9 were bought by a finnish commander from germany but only 3 were delivered. Of the 3 two vehicles featured the german cupola while the third shown below was an unmodified version.
More images of the rare Centauro II variant equipped with the Leonardo 105/52 cannon
1.0 SPAA for USSR (Its real)
Nah, give to US, they need more SPAAs after all
Example of gunship
C-295 ISR-The spanish gunship
Given the current approach to incorporating such features into the game, my answer would be no. It would evolve an already highly controversial topic, which is the CAS issue in Ground RB, into a bigger issue.
Leopard? add more armor
Abrams? add more armor
Leclerc? add more armor
I think i’m starting to see a pattern here
Btw, was these mods ever tested out for the trials or just planned if they did end up winning?
Just planned if they had won
Yes as premium C130, Spooky from vitnam, the chinook one oh gopod pls add them as premiums or event vehciles!!
This Belgian anti-tank vehicle was designed by the German company Rheinstahl AG and started production in 1965. A purchase contract, covering 80 vehicles, was signed by Belgium in 1972.
The JPK (jagdpanzerkannone) 90 mm intended for Belgian infantry is somewhat different from the model produced for the German army. Among other differences, the undercarriage was taken from the marder instead, same for its gear. Also a SABCA Gun fire and control system, already in use with the Belgian Leopards, was installed, which included a rangefinder and night vision.
JPK-90 - Belgian Jagdpanzer with lasers
With the introduction of the ZSU-23-4M2 (and possibly the Osa-AK/Osa-AKM and Su-24M) we head back to the Soviet-era. I think this is an area that should be focused on getting caught up on.
Also, remove the Agava Thermal Imager from the T-80BV. It was a singular prototype and sets a bad in-game precedent.
Agreed. Should just be a event vehicle or squadron vehicle or something.
T-55M5: The K5 Monster
No, they can add a 2nd T-80B to the tree without it at 10.0, but there’s zero reason to remove or change the current one.
This game is full of singular or low run prototypes, there’s no precedent to set at all, let alone a “bad” one.
Aerfer leone:
MB-339 (especially with the PAN livery):
And of course the almighty eurofighter:
I actually want a better WW2 era italian techtree but we are still waiting and will wait probably forever.
If they do that, it will most likely become a vehicle that only one’s to research it will have (just like Panther 2, except being real).
And probably will insert a proper T-80BV with 1985 composites. Maybe do it in a way of T-64B, where even T-64B in stock has it’s own version of 5 layered composite (as in 1984 before BV thats the version produce), with 1984 T-80B with a 5 layer composites.
Additionally I’ve read there were a testing serie of Agava thermals made for testing purpose, so they could have gone to some T-80B or other T serie really.
I personally see no reason to.
Hell at some points of the game nations have to completely resort to single existing prototypes to even play the game.
This would be a straight buff to the vehicle really, either reducing BR, or up armouring it.
It’s already second best 10.3 IMO, no need to make it better or make it the best 10.0
From T-80U then too.
