The F-15SG picture you chose is from a USAF squadron, China has no claim to it
Not a domestic vehicle in sight 💔
2 Likes
It’s the year 2027. Everything in War Thunder is either Leopards or T-80s.
Jokes aside, I’d hate the addition. Entirely C&P subtree, that’s LITERALLY what the game needs right now!
1 Like
China can also get the Centurion
1 Like
if i may, propose a wheeled vehicle line for the US, given by how large of an importance the willis jeep played in ww2, and the large roll the Humvees played in the gulf war and even today
of which would later go into HMMWV or Humvees (which they are better known as) of which would give the US some of the vehicles that were heavily used during WW2, Korea, and Vietnam and then the Gulf war and so on, to some extent depending on BR placement, could be used as either AT or anti light vehicle/AA
with things such as, a up armored hull, protective glass around the gunner and such being researchable modifications, although they won’t extend to far into the tech tree (most likely Cap out at 8.7/9.7 or something) it would still be a neat couple of additions, not to mention all the field modifications that were done to said vehicles ( i remember (don’t quote me on this, i’m not fully sure about it) that gaijin once said, at least in some letter from the devs or something that they wanted to add more marine vehicles somewhere around the time the of the Click bait or something)
6 Likes
I literally emphasized Singapore on the wishlist. Of course I want to have domestic vehicles too, like:
Spoiler
But I much rather have the Singapore vehicles when there’s still a chance
2 Likes
you said it, not me
With german style muzzle brake.
Might not end up being the case, bub :
China can only debate on getting M1A2T or not.
1 Like
one can only hope. That’s why I wanted it in asap, before Gaijin can change its mind. Personally, I’m willing to forego vehicles being added into Chinese TT for a whole year or two in exchange for the Leopard 2SG and F-15SG being added into the Chinese TT
what’s the debate? ROC uses it, ROC is part of Chinese TT, therefore it should be in the Chinese TT. It’s only a matter of when.
My own perspective on this is, if we are getting a sub-tree instead of a reshuffle that makes China a 5-line nation (won’t happen) I’d rather that sub-tree be Singapore.
Suggesting Pakistan, Laos, Myanmar or Cambodia (and Vietnam especially) is making a fool of yourself. North Korea on the other hand is decent for ground, but has no air. Singapore is the only really decent sub-tree China can get.
So I hope they go ahead with it. ROC/SG lineups have been my dream for a while.
1 Like
In my opinion China doesn’t need anything from Singapore. They already have access to Pakistan and Bangladesh if they want a subtree.
- F-15SG → J-15, J-16, Su-35
- F-16s → JF-17 Block III, J-10B, J-10C, Pakistani F-16C Block 52+, RoC F-16V Block 70
- Leopard 2SG → M1A2T, other domestic MBTs
All of these Singaporean vehicles should go to a TT that is either lacking in these departments or could benefit greatly from getting them.
Both Japan and Israel would greatly benefit from having the F-15SG in their tech trees. It provides a proper top tier platform with a proper AESA radar.
Japan’s only other options are the F-2A (which isn’t top tier for a reason) and F-15JSI (which isn’t in production yet). I should also mention Thailand doesn’t have the JAS39E yet, so that’s not a clear outcome.
Israel doesn’t have a top tier AESA carrier until the F-35 unless Israel upgrades their Ra’am or procures their F-15IAs faster. So again the F-15SG would be a good, clear option.
I could go on. Japan would benefit from getting a modern F-16C Block 52+ from Singapore as it would be an alternative to the F-2A and JAS39C. Israel would benefit from getting a modern Leopard 2 variant so it doesn’t just have Merkavas and Namers at top tier. The point is that China has their own options while other nations would benefit much more from getting Singaporean vehicles than China would.
7 Likes
Make DIRCM jam less missiles at once. EC665 and IRIS-T are basically useless for me… And seeing how your whole team dies to one helicopter - just makes top tier not fun anymore
With Indonesia being added into the heli tree, they comfortably solve the issues with both the Air and Heli trees, Rafale F.4s have begun low rate deliveries with the first twin seater changing hands recently, which should plug the gap until F-35s arrive. Heli wise they operate AH-64E, though without only 114Rs buuut wouldn’t be too much a stretch to just add JGAMs.
(They also have a similarly upgraded 2A4 to the 2SG)
(They also operate my beloved Scorpion 90)
4 Likes
Is there such a thing as a T-64AMV? I.E. a T-64AV with the 1000hp engine?
We have flamethrower tanks and even a boat with flamethrowers.
Why not flamethrower planes?
(He-111 and Ju-88 with flame throwers, Not sure what their exact model is though)
6 Likes
Yees.
US makes and operates them
I think pretty much every 64E is JAGM compatible. But Indonesia isn’t really as close to the US as other 64E operators so it could be different