Your blindness is not service related
2 Likes
I forgot about that second one, I am disappointed that it still isn’t in the game
Who wouldn’t love a 37mm gatling gun
1 Like
Right? Even with the ammo crate, you would still have some issues with ammo, but to hell with that.
1 Like
oh yeah its still tilted in favor of CAS just not as much as it used to be. which is why while I find the idea of ARMs and ECM being added cool on paper especially for the potential use in air battles(and it might happen soon from how things are looking) I am mostly against it at the moment on the grounds that it will just end up make playing SAMs even more of a chore than they already are.
There are honestly a lot of weapons i would be fine with gaijin adding(this includes MMW weapons btw) just as long as they are allowed nowhere near ground battles. But unfortunately gaijin will never limit stuff like that so i guess it is what it is.
1 Like
Actually, if it had been adopted it would definitely have been run with an ammo carrier. With the addition of multi vehicle systems, why not give it the same thing but the secondary vehicle is just an ammo carrier?
There’s disappointingly not enough info to ever get it into war thunder, the only info I know of is from the patent which is actually just about the suspension
1 Like
RIP 8x8 vulcan car
What’s the MLRS that I see there? Also, M270 when?
Question: Was the EAP ever known to have been intended to be armed in anyway whatsoever other than having provisions?
The Su-47 suggestion isn’t too strange to me because muh Yak-141 with all the stuff it never got, but the yak prototype (prototypess?) was apparently planned to get. I ain’t gaijin, nor too familiar with these aircraft in particular, but it seems like the Su-47 doesn’t break their rules if I understand them correctly.
Now I remember the MiG 1.44 being up for a bit before it got taken down, but iirc wasn’t the consensus that it wasn’t ever planned to be armed? Maybe my memory on that is fuzzy, but that’s what I thought happened with that suggestion, and if it was it supports my idea on the whole planned provisions for “unfinished prototypes” rule.
3 Likes
The EAP was never meant to be armed, but as far as I know, the Su-47 wasn’t meant to be armed either.
The MiG 1.44 was a demonstrator, that is true, but the MiG 1.42 was supposed to be armed, as the 1.42 would be the production variant and there were prototypes for that.
So, if anything, the MiG 1.44/1.42 would be a more realistic addition than the Su-47, based on the Yak-141s case.
On top of that, the Su-47 never was considered to become a service aircraft, as they realised that the design was extremely flawed
1 Like
Mockups huh, gimme the Aim-152 gaijin, or the funny Phoenix II as I call it
6 Likes
Do know you if hellfire as a surface to air missile, is supposed to have more than 7g rating than what is implemented in game?
Spoiler
Nah, how about Mach 5 AGMs?
2 Likes
Where ARMIGER )))
Oh wait, even this went beyond mockup
2 Likes
Hes a turbo main lmao, joins a swedish air thread and immediately tries to change the focus to Russian air and starts trying to start fights lmao, hes a clown
2 Likes
Then defence of the BMPT has been rather funny
1 Like
I dont need to read it to imagine hes probably suggesting 11.0 or 11.3 lmao hes got no skill