i mean its better than aim9x as its radar guided and has loft.
I mean how hard the hellfire can pull G’s. 7g’s which is currently implemented in game, as a surface to air missile while not hit any plane in the sky. Aim9x is like 40g missile
oh yea
anyway, the Aussie/Brit Boxer one is the proto
so … the actual inducted variant can still come to the Brit TT (lmao)?
…
and also, Aussies trialed a bunch of stuffs for Project LAND 400 Phase 2 :
but there’s always the OG :
3 Likes
i dont have specifics i am sorry.
mach 5 ASRAAM?
Yup.
Flame has docs for aerodynamic heating for the ASRAAM and research papers showing that that level of aerodynamic heating would just be impossible without reaching Mach 4.5-5.0 or even higher. MBDA only ever started greater than Mach 3. (His post on it)
Typhoon is just an ASRAAM with a HEAT warhead instead of blast-frag
2 Likes
I mean yeah the overall CAS vs AA balance is better than it ever was. Only major exceptions are LDIRCM in general and Israel being cucked in terms of top tier AA.
Is it perfect? of course not, but it’s already much better than it has been most of the past years.
(Also when facing one I much prefer to face Kh38 compared to spice 250.)
1 Like
As much as I like wheely bois, I’d rather have the AS21 Redback, as that is neither a LAV or a Boxer and would be entirely unique (until South Korea finds a home in WT)
(And it comes with ATGMs, unlike that Pars Alpha thing)
1 Like
Now they need to fix AA vs AA. A majority of 12.7 SPAA is not equivalent especially given the radars some need to be a lower BR
1 Like
They need to decompress the hell out of top tier first
2 Likes
Agreed
I really don’t understand why almost none of the top tier AAs have TWS ESA, even though I have seen reports/claims for a lot of the top tier AAs that they have ESA radars irl.
3 Likes
This is also a pretty good reason for the addition of submarines/carriers in the future. They’re other whole tech trees that can be built up over time
1 Like
thing is from what we know of MMW it has a really short range so if they added it with LOBL with mode 2 they would still nead to guide the brimstone till about 5km
also the request for MMW were mostly curbed with the introduction of the SPICE-250 finally giving the EFT some kind of FnF weapon (still think brimstone 2s should be added as they would still be SAL they would just have a longer range then 12km)
Man, I may not really care about submarines, but it’s actually kind of insulting that we are getting infantry before submarines.
I can understand why they are taking their time with carriers though. It’s probably hard to find a way to make them fun to play for both sides.
1 Like
the 2 Bradlees in question
Typhoon when lol
Yep, god damn that would be funny, but alas, its not a soviet weapon, so doesnt fall under the same rules unfortunately
There is a distinction between light vehicles with a gun/ATGM combo and pure ATGM carriers and I believe what @WaffleStomp0768-live here is asking for is a pure ATGM carrier.
You know, stuff like the Swingfire, Khrizantema or Zachlam Tager.
2 Likes