It’s just another name of GB1000 I think
This is made by CSGC and GB1000 is made by Norinco(If I’m not mistaken)
Norinco is the main agent for most of Chinese exporting weapons.
so it’s the situation of CSGC product name and Norinco product name.
and Norinco is really bad at naming things. Recent example is VN-23 is another Institute‘s product, while 8x8 version VN-22 assult gun is VA-1.
1 Like
the sp1c has only a 300mm pen heat round. It would probably be at 6.7 or 7.0 like the german m41.
The vk16.02 chassie was build but not the turret which makes it the same problem like the removed corelian.
I looked into swiss vehicles but they dont have fitting vehicles either.
There are no different versions. The barrles could be interchanged on the fly. The 35mm still has 120 mm pen and still with 400 rpm. It would be 9.7 or higher aswell like the VBCI-2 (MCT30)
No, a build hull is allready a real partial prototype, however you switch up the Vk 16.03 with the Vk 16.02.
The Vk 16.03 has the Puma turret, the 02 has a 20mm gun Luchs turret.
(If i remember correct) But that doesnt matter, i assume you mean this?
1 Like
They wouldn’t be realistic as they are literally fictional. It’s why we call them ‘paper vehicles’.
That’s more just your personal preference. Personally, I’d like to just be able to make a historical line-up: a West-german M47 with a marder and M109 for example or an East-german line-up with a T-72, T-55 and other basic soviet equipment. If a vehicle served in the german armed forces I believe that we should be able to play it. Most players won’t fully grind more than one Tech tree.
There has been no official declaration that swiss vehicles now exclusively reside in the German tech tree. It’s also very much not needed outside of maybe top tier Air. There are hundreds of german service vehicles and prototypes that can still be added.
2 Likes
I think the 02 has the “puma turret”. Never heard about the 03. But on drawings of the vk1602 the turret seems bigger thant the one of the puma
The suggestion you linked seems to have a totally different chassie which isnt flat over the tracks like the vk1602
Yeah i mixed some stuff up.
1 Like
Could be that i am wrong because due to world of tanks the internet is full of fake pictures
Tho the whole of Vk 16.02 wasnt build iirc.
1 Like
even worse. But the 50mm gun wouldnt bring this tank to rank 3 either way. Maybe gaijin releases another version of the pak wagon as a light tank. I read somewhere on this forum that there was one
Well, either 7,5 cm K. L/41 Versuchsträger 1 or 2 or the Pz.Sfl.II would be a good Rank III Light tank.
1 Like
With 118 pen it could be barely enough for rank 3. All are half-tracks though and slow.
I meant this from the old forum: 234/4 mit AK7B (alternative gun for the 75mm Pakpuma) - enough to be viable for inclusion? - Light Vehicles - War Thunder - Official Forum
yes
I fear that thing also wasnt build and would also not be turreted.
The K.Gr. Rot Pz would has more penetration than russian 7,62 cm guns and 7,5 cm M3, high filler, also for more angled pen you still have HEAT rounds with 57mm/60°
Sluggish, yeah maybe, tho for my taste enove, and a relatively good top speed.
1 Like
yeah but at least the chassie was build and the gun. Just not fitted together.
The K.Gr. Rot Pz would has more penetration than russian 7,62 cm guns, high filler, also for more angled pen you still have HEAT rounds with 57mm/60°
Sluggish, yeah maybe, tho for my taste enove, and a relatively good top speed.
Yeah maybe it’s enough. Though heat really lacks in post pen. With good acceleration and high fire rate it could be a decent vehicle.
Dont know if half tracks have bonuses from both wheels and tracks but at least it doesnt get stuck on hills like wheeled tanks
Yes, but that is not enove for the suggestion, because the chassis was in use for 4 series of vehicles, and the gun wasnt only for the vehicle.
Half tracks are favoured in game and act more in the direction of tracks. How good the accelleration is, it will be slightly better (i think) than the in game Sd.Kfz.6/2. And the advantage of slightly better driving controll for turning and such.
And i dont have problems with the Gr.38 Hl/C, i dont know how it is at the Top tiers, but against Shermans and T-34, the Gr.38 works quite good, duo to their open construction. If not the K.Gr.Rot Pz will do short work anyway.
