Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Looking forward to that. I really like the battlepasses sure some were mediocre and the first ones were amazing but they still are fun and some of my favourite vehicles came with them.
AH-1
PBM-5A
Bv-1555
Sd.Kfz.251/22
To name a few.

This maybe incorporated into the main update, since thats what usually happens with the anniversary patch.

eh not the only one suffering, the challenger 2s are going to 12.0 with no buffs yet other tanks are getting buffs to be moved up to 12.0 (the Arriets and Merkavas) the one thing the challenger 2s had was a 5 second reload when everyone else had 6 or 7, but this was limited to 4 shots due to the very small ready rack.

now lets see
The Abrams with an 18 round ready rack
The Arietes with a 15 round ready rack
The Merkivas with a 10 round ready rack

all of these tanks are a lot faster then the challenger 2s and have better ammo then them, now they also have the same reload

1 Like

I think it is time to put down the argument about who is the worst between top tier Britain and China. They are roughly equally horrible - and should not be such. Equally bad pen, one with a horrible reload, one losing its edge in reload - both having pretty bad armor, one with mobility and one without.

tbh would take china for the simple reason they are always paired with russia so dont need to worry about planes, and can actually use their cas

HMS Vanguard is fine. She entered service

G3: Riley has some evidence it started construction:

1 Like

Revenge class ships would be a nice touch, HMS Royal Oak and Arkhangelsk.

2 Likes

If they nerf US by giving amphibious assault ships instead of super carriers that would be pretty lame

But that’s far off if ever

USS Iowa update after this one?

Have you ever considered that Britain was still effectively in the jutlands?
Its okay, we will blow up iowas easily with the hood. Just like bismarck. Superior British Engineering.

4 Likes

Wasn’t Jutland WW1? I don’t think we are talking about the same king George V

Yes but Superior British Engineering has made sure the jutland royal navy efficient to crush any WW2 navy. US, Japan, Germany, etc. The soviets had to resort to paper ships. Iowas stand no chance compared to the royal navy.

1 Like

Ohhhhh u were talking about the dreadnought huh, thought u meant the WW2 kgV

I made a mistake when discussing the KGV. It will break the balance in game as even the yamato shines pale. That is why Japan IRL was desprate enough to use torpedo bombers to intercept them.

Yes, it was. 99% if our additions in the past 2 years have originated from Jutland era. We have yet to get a single WW2 BC/BB Our most modern ship is Renown from the 1920s if im not mistaken.

US has 5 BBs from 1940s. Despite the fact the RN was far far stronger than the US navy up until the end of WW2. Its kinda stupid we are so badly handicapped

(I want the WW2 KGV)

My bad then, then we should have the submarine USS Iowa

Well refits yeah, but nothing laid down in 30’s or 40’s afaik

Alaska was laid down in 1941. the others are refits.

(though we dont even have the refits we just have the original WW1 versions)

Not a battleship though