What I hate about india so far is that they refuse or lack the ability atm to give britain the unique indian tanks like their mbt, jets or light tanks
2 Likes
honestly some of the memes that come out of here are so good lol
This is some level of sensationalism.
India is a sub tree of Britain. Do you know what combat aircraft India operate the largest number of? Su-30MKII why should the nation that has India in it’s sub tree not get the aircraft that India operate?
If it was announced tomorrow Britain received Indian Su-7 no one would care.
The same as if they received an SA Cheetah or Mirage 3.
It’s only an issue when its a top tier vehicle.
There is though. Skill based reward, tech tree completion bonus, and foldered vehicles.
@SPANISH_AVENGER
Aren’t you an advocate for air RB EC which also allows for lineups?
I mean, I somewhat understand the issue. Subtrees right now are just a weird excuse to C&P stuff between nations and maybe add a handful of misrepresented modifications.
It takes away space in the “main” nation, and lets the other nations act like they are lesser nations worth nothing more than a s cheap filler.
That’s why I really hope they rework the way subtrees function to benefit all nations involved. Though even then there is other things I should suggest to go with it, like lowered RP cost for repeating (C&P) vehicles and more clear cut nation-specific aircraft loadouts and ground vehicle shell selections that favor historical accuracy and exporting nations.
1 Like
Oh wait someone brought up the “its not needed” argument?
Bet lets see.
Dont add the f18 to anyone as its not needed
Dont add j11B its not needed
Dont add the f2 its not needed
Uhhhh dont add any new MBTs anymore, theyre no longer needed
What else what else
2 Likes
They should, but they won’t do it soon, because it’s development time that could be spent elsewhere
3 Likes
like an auction house? item recycling (but it gives you back the stuff you just tried to rid yourself of)? uhh, ctrl c ctrl v developing (they do it so often the just rebinded right and left click)
It’s not about whether it’s needed or not.
It’s about whether it renders grinding other actions POINTLESS by giving a single one all of their vehicles or not.
Why grind Russia? We got their best jet, SU-30, on U.K!
Why grind France? We got their best jet, Rafale, on U.K!
Because literal EUROFIGHTER TYPHOON was not enough apparently.
Etc.
9 Likes
Marut is cool.
So issues with creating and spending time modeling something for a single nation.
Tejas is cool and unique but it’s not worth the time and effort or cost to model it, add it to game and test it.
It’s not going to draw in new players and most players dont even know it exists.
Like the IAR 93 we will only see this aircraft if a fan models it.
Let’s check RR&D…
Oh, more fights over the world’s most controversial sub-tree.
These two things (vehicles and web features or even just features in general) are done by entirely different people and teams.
1 Like
Theres a user made model for it too thats really nice to look at ^^
1 Like
Except it never has previously and this time is no different.
If it makes it pointless for YOU thats a personal issue, which is irrelevant to the discussion.
Historically theres been countless times where several nations posessed the same top end vehicles and guess what… people still grinded them
2 Likes
Yeah, it’s nice to have that, but I feel like it needs to be a clearly noticeable effect of “2nd Chaffee is cheaper than the first, 3rd is cheaper again” and so on, to really make what is now just uninteresting C&P to some have a strong advantage compared to unique vehicles.
While playing the same Sherman 8 times (even with the nation completion bonus, especially when that only affects 5 games a day and doesn’t stack past that) might feel stale, getting it as a cheap addition to a lineup in a new nation can make it feel really rewarding again and give a sense of “I’m progressing this fast, because I worked up to this point”.
Getting a 40.000 RP tank for the 8th time with an RP bonus for 5 games feels a lot different from having the price visibly cut in half (example value, I didn’t calculate it and only guessed).
1 Like
Yep ergo pointless as my point was made.
Gaijin can delete the whole purpose of having a subtree. In which case remove them
Perhaps because it was plane from some “major” nation, that don’t lack player and would always bring lot of players and money even if their vehicles end in another TT, they also would still have other domestic option that are unique to them.