Ah ok very interesting.
Would be a nice addition but i guess the chance is very small that we would get that.
Did he check if it was with flaps down by chance so he didn’t screw up like with F-8E lol?
Actually not surprsied by that one. Always looked like it was overperforming
1 Like
You forgot about 1 of 2 rank 8 squadron tanks, the T 80 U.
Love how Sweden and Germany just get rank 8 squadron tanks for 0 conceivable reason.
I already mentioned before that the t80 made no sense. It shouldve been the christian 2 or a finnish patria
1 Like
I dont work for gaijin, gaijin made a really cool finnish air tree with a ton of unique vehicles wanna see it?
I dont own these this was someone elses image
(Hey at least they learned there lesson with finland and made hungary have some cool unique ground additions that are really useful. Hopefully theyll continue that trend with air right? Right…?)
7 Likes
I mean they just do whatever.
11.3 T-80UK? Rank 7.
11.3 M1A1 AIM? Rank 7.
11.0 T 80 U? Rank 8.
11.3 Leopard 2PL? Rank 8.
But specifically Swedish T-80 is about how Gaijin are willing to put “Would have been, could have been” which I like and think is cool.
Not too keen on how really inconsistent and arbitrary they seem with it sometimes.
I wish they’d drop the pretense and just say “We do whatever we think fits or is needed.”
You say that but they literally did less with the JA37D it got 9Ls and BOL pods
Because of the T80 U finland is only bringing one unique thing to the table when it comes to air and that is the f18 then its done. Ground idk they couldve added the Sturmi or the Nikki but no they went with whatever took the least amount of work. Dont get me wrong copy and paste is good if its done right. The balance of C&P with actual unique additions is acceptable by most and yet here we are. Same goes for the t80 it shouldnt have come but it did. Nothing we can do about it now unfortunately. Trial vehicles do open one door for every nation which is very debatable and that is trial vehicles. I think they are both good and bad. Do i think the US needs xyz russian (plane, tank) no. Do i think (insert nation that is missing vehicles at br and has a few trialed vehicles that could fill the gap when nothing else is left?) Eh i think it might be worth it as to not exclude them.
Thats actually more than it takes as that includes new weaponry. See as long as it has one new missile it can be new vehicle in gaijins eyes. Now does that mean a radar and targeting pod is as worthy, probably not.
Fits better
1 Like
Perhaps
I’d be overjoyed to see this forgotten aircraft receive some attention!
Genuinely a better fighter than F-104. Such a shame that it lost all the export contracts due to Lockheed’s foul play.
4 Likes
Yes this has nothing to do with this topic
1 Like
This should be a special event medal just thought it would be cool
F-20 is also overperforming too
Not surprised by that either.
(I think i’ve heard somewhere it just uses the F-5 FM, but could be wrong)
Since we have a Fokker G.1 in the leak I wonder if this will be an updated version of that user model almost 10 years ago ?
1 Like
Just stop it now
2 Likes