I mean, a united Korea (about as cursed as the united China) could also work:
[united korea poster]
poll
Hi there! I’d like to present my idea for a United Korean Ground Forces tech tree, taking the best parts of the North and South and making a complete 5-line tree with as little copy-paste as possible. There is a lot of debate about where Korean vehicles should go in-game: the most common opinions seem to be the North within the Chinese tree, or the South within the US or Japanese trees, but a large number of people also want a United Korean tree, and so here it is! K…
or as a subtree form:
These would just be skins in the US tech tree. With only some planes actually deserving a separate addition in the USA TT.
poll
poll
Hello, and welcome to my suggestion for the South Korean Air Forces tech tree. This is somewhat of a direct continuation of my first post for the Ground Forces tech tree and as such is starting at tier IV. This will make it similar to the Israeli tech tree as it is implemented in game currently, and makes sense due to the history of the Republic of Korea Air Force in which is what founded after the end of World War II and its splitting with Japan. During the early stages, the Republic…
poll
Welcome, today I’m going to present to you my idea for the South Korean Ground Forces Tech Tree. This tech tree is going to be similar to the Israeli tech tree, in which you do not have the lower tiers and simply start around tier 4 when South Korea starts to have unique vehicles. Since we already have Israel in game with a shortened tech tree, I believe that it only makes sense that for a nation like South Korea, where their entire early tiers would be made out of only imports with zero do…
South Korea is just incredibly small historically speaking regarding the armoured vehicle defense industry. It could work as a US sub tree…
2 Likes
I definitely would grind a full Korean TT, would be fun.
2 Likes
That would also be super cool! I just want to see all things represented in game if you know what i mean so i’m excited for anything lol.
@SPANISH_AVENGER
HSTVL’s reload is correct, its allegedly misnamed round is correct, its autoloader is correct, its thermals and optics are correct, its speed is mostly correct [all tanks are potentially over-performing and under-performing in speed].
And no one’s claiming it’s OP, and right now HSTVL isn’t nerfed. You’re acting like it’s 12.0 currently when it’s 11.3.
If HSTVL was so bad as haters claim then my KDR in it would be lower than Begleit, 2S38, and so forth.
Oh, and your post contains gaslighting too.
Accusing people of being crazy is the textbook definition of gaslighting; something most War Thunder players seem to not know…
2 Likes
Let’s see how much better your stats are. Can someone look him up on thunderskill?
Bonrath
August 11, 2024, 5:47pm
270
Their monthlys are both mid af
No he is claiming the HSTVL is soooo good becuase he does soooo good with it. I want to see his HSTVL stats
3 Likes
Thunderskill is incredibly inaccurate if you want to compare stats tbh. Even for a single player.
2 Likes
Bonrath
August 11, 2024, 5:49pm
273
Eh. The general stats mean enuf to me but sure, I understand where ur coming from
I’m definitely more in favour of a joint tree but do to it’s nature as a half tree if a very much a later thing for me. I’d rather the some many nations with low tier/start at rank 1/WW2 come first.
But as I said if I had to give the US a sub-tree it would be SK.
“Are you nuts?” is an English colloquial expression, not “accusing you of being crazy”.
“You are delusional and belong in an asylum” IS accusing people of being crazy. See the difference?
Top Ground BR is 11.7.
XM885, also known as Delta-3, is missing the reported penetration and post-penetration effects akin to those of the M774 105mm round.
HSTVL is also missing the HE-VT XM884 round and Air Tracking mechanic.
It should also have a 0.6 second reload. You can read about these issues on these reports:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/XkXQmkdF1vvM
9 Likes
Begleit’s is being “fixed” since it was my first auto-light I used and didn’t know its playstyle.
@SPANISH_AVENGER
Air tracking and HE-VT will not make it better against tanks, thus wouldn’t be used ever by me and other light tank users cause anti-air is the job of anti-air vehicles.
I know, i want them too, but i didnt make this list sorry
1 Like
SpanishAvenger and AlvisWisla try not to get into a argument on the forums challenge
(None of the argument will bring change)
7 Likes
luque13
August 11, 2024, 5:57pm
281
The PUMA isn’t enough Germany need a wheeled Puma…
No Australian Boxer and no UK Boxer
Now that’s interesting; I thought personal performances were not valid proof of anything… yet it suddenly is?
It would allow it to function against helicopters and low-flying aircraft- because tanks are not the only threat present on the battlefield.
I am sure no one ever uses the additional capabilities of multi-role vehicles just “because it is the job other vehicles”.
Then I hope you don’t engage MBTs with your Light Tanks, since that’s the job of other MBTs, right?
5 Likes
DevilO6
August 11, 2024, 5:58pm
283
Hey, it has been only, like 15h since the last one? Progress :)!
/j
1 Like
luque13:
a wheeled Puma
How? There are none in service and only the Boxer is in prototype phases now. Do you mean the:
poll
[image]
History The Boxer armored vehicle project, initiated in 1993 by France and Germany, saw the UK join in 1996. After France’s exit in 1999, the Netherlands joined in 2001. The project produced twelve prototypes and introduced the “Boxer” name in 2002. The UK departed the project in 2003, while the Netherlands and Germany proceeded with orders of 200 and 272 vehicles, respectively, with the Dutch deliveries starting from 2013 and the first German Boxer delivered in 2009.
The integrat…
?