Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

[Rowiek]

The fact its a tested vehicle doesnt automatically mean its going to be a premium. We have lots of paper and prototypes in TT’s.

[StormRyder13]

Apparently, it was used for mobility and a few other tests before it broke down and became a target.

Or well that was what I had read.

[Smin1080p_WT]

@Favnirbane

Cheers. Do you know why the finnish vehicles that previously were obtainable under the German nation wasnt added to the Swedes when the Finnish tree was introduced? Not only the KV1, but also the Hawk

These vehicles were previously event / exclusive rewards.

[Deathmisser]

No need to be rude plus I need to have time to read what Smin said before committing on

[JimmieJugend]

I see. Genuine question, does that make it a different case than the Merkavas?

[StormRyder13]

Because a prototype is something that nation built so of course it makes sense to be TT.
But a tested vehicle was neither built nor modified by the nation getting it. So it makes the most sense as an event and it was a limited-use vehicle in the tree getting it. So it should be limited-use in WT.

Plus we have the unfished prototype rules:

Rules, Guidelines & Tips For Creating Suggestions (Check Before Creating A New Suggestion!)

Differentiating “Paper”/Fictional Vehicles from (unfinished) Prototypes Sometimes it’s easy to mistake a prototype vehicle for a paper one, while at other times making that distinction becomes difficult due to, for example, parts of the design existing while the full vehicle itself was never built. As these cases often result in a vehicle’s classification being subject to individual interpretation, we’ve come up with a few simple guidelines to help users make this distinction easier and faster.…

This shows what is possible to come to the game for prototypes.

[Deathmisser]

Praying for a thread lock lol 😂

[Smin1080p_WT]

@Favnirbane

I see. Genuine question, does that make it a different case than the Merkavas?

Often it depends on the type of event they were obtained in and also the choices available for others. Merkavas are very hard to avoid when introducing Israel :)

[hienapunk]

Seems pretty arbitrary :/

[_Renzo]

There is a difference between testing though. You can test a vehicle because you want to buy/produce it for use in your army or you want to see how certain things/systems function for possible future projects. Which is somewhat fine for TT.

This one is just “oh hey we’ll test our weapons on it, see how good our stuff is”.

[hienapunk]

@_Renzo

This one is just “oh hey we’ll test our weapons on it, see how good our stuff is”.

They wouldnt have got it in a running state if this was true.

[JimmieJugend]

Thanks! So its not a hard definition.

Think Merkavas are difficult, try avoiding a Patton…

[Arghail]

Speaking of Swedish heavy tank… Would the Kranvagn be unacceptable for War Thunder, given that it was at least half built ?

[Mercenario54]

When could we expect devblogs of next update?

[AWACS Ghost Eye]

Yes and no. It is half done so no, but it is Swedish so it could slide in, even to the tech tree.
Whilst the centauro lancia with both the proposal and the two parts(M113 ADATS turret, B1 centauro hull) are still not even close to planned.

[StormRyder13]

It got passed to the devs so they are at least considering it.

[I_9029]

so as we reached a new low standard for vehicle addition, can we expect the last low standard be applied to other nation?

[Shay]

Only Russia, of course, since Gaijin has a massive boner for it and Sweden.

[someweirdname]

let’s rather say it is expectable that they know of it’s existence

[Godvana]

@Stona_WT

The performance indicators of the 2S38 correspond to the average value at its rank, without being low or high. However like many other lightly armored vehicles, the 2S38 has significant empty areas behind the turret and hull, where hits here can create situations with insufficient or no damage to critical modules. The 2S38 will be one of the first vehicles to receive additional internal detail . Others will follow too, as we’ll improve the layout of internal modules, add some new modules and revise old ones in particular in the turret and turret compartment.

Is anyone surprised? xD