The bigger problem is the optics. It can oneshot anything, yet the 3.9-9x optics and lack of thermals is the problem. 10.7 would be good I suppose.
the T80 UM 2 stands at 11.0 and with better armor sure but without thermals but since this has objectively worse armor and sights plus no thermals i guess it would be good at 10.7
I don’t get thermals how does making everything black and white help you?
If anything all it’s done has got me killed because I could no longer tell what was dead or alive.
At 10.7 it also meant that there are a lot less error margins. Chinese 10.7 MBTs can lolpen the tanks anywhere while tanke between 10.3 and 11.0 can also return fire if the 292 did not land a kill, since things like type 90, ariete P, or others has enough firepower. For a tank that is effectively bringing a mosin with an ACOG into thermal M4 PMC factory, it firepower would be better balanced against error making rooms rather than other aspects.
I mean, leopards(and of40), 8-16x, easy to identify foes at a long range and do the jobs a leopard 1s good at: snipe, with or without thermals. Thats also what makes TURMS more comfortable than T-64B. The 292 has a 9x optics at max, meaning that thermals would be very nice on bigger maps.
@Mytho61734 remember how i said everyone is demanding leopards for their trees?, now i saw it all
1 guy wants a 2a7Q (qatar) for israel of all nations, literaly no correlations at all. His reasoning is merkavas are bad
I guess he has a low i “Q” level
2 Likes
ehhhh, that joke was dodgy, do not recommend it
1 Like
Yea that going to isreal is dumb. If its ever added it will likely (unfortunately) be a german premium
Props going to get banned over it lol
or even a combined arabaic tree in some kind, but not israel out of all countries jesus, it annoys me how he didnt even made a poll to choose where it shall go
1 Like
Yea lmao
Today just seems to be: bad takes on vehicle placement.
Remember the YouTuber Deathmisser posted earlier?
When someone had asked about Poland they argued that the separation across multiple trees is a good thing.
Like my dear, the whole reason people are pushing for these trees is for that not to happen. So they can play their stuff in the same line-up.
1 Like
I mean if Jerusalem is willing to give IMI a bit more, like 2 NIS, it probably can make tanks that are not bad.
Edit: and oh god am I dying inside grinding with the merkava.
Just a reminder to everyone
1 Like
Being the worst of the best is still the best…
MICA IR would make these aircraft 13.3+.
doesnt point 1 and 4 work hand in hand?
2 Likes
I say 1,2 and 4 all work together.
Smin said the only reason Hungary was chosen was because they already had vehicles in there prior.
So 2 more or less will just end up as 1 and 1 will end up as 4.
So it’s not really a good poll imho lol
1 Like
Im sure everyone is sick of hearing about it but no it doesnt work really, SAF has prevented, or at least delayed the addition of british light tanks and IFVs.
This wouldn’t be that much of an issue if SAF had been added with more vehicles that would help the lack of light tanks / IFVs, for example the South African badger.
I support sub trees but i dont support adding south africa that is incomplete, especially when the UK could have got other commonwealth nations that would be better for filling out the tree and providing an air sub tree as well
2 Likes
Those mock battles often have wild scenarios like severely off setting one side and “shot down” is assumed from a point of getting a lock.
Just sayin’
Still nice pic of 5 kills from an F4.