India is an official sub tree for Britain, so I have no problem with that.
2 Likes
Oh I’m sure that Israel or whatever other nation will somehow qualify for a Eurofighter premium
I loved how the Russian cried for not wanting to face the same missile lmao
1 Like
It would be nice to see one of the upgrade CF-188s in the TT for the UK.
maybe this: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=w3IogrW0mNk
(Note this is one of, if not the best, channel for Canadian military stuff (primarily aircraft))
Hey guys, take a look at this. Regarding infantry mode, I think we can have more activity in this mode.
Well since the American F/A-18F got denied (for now) for being the same plane I think this too would get denied for being basically the same in capability as the Australian Super Hornet
F-18F has IRST equipped in it’s state card but it does not have the IRST. What happened to the IRST that the superhornets were supposed to receive?
IRST pod was there in dev then got removed in live. I can’t remember if it was mentioned by devs or CM tho
63 now
4 Likes
That’s sad to hear. Hopefully we get it next update.
Depends, I ask for the HEP upgrades (AIM-9X, 120D, AESA and other stuff)
But it’s painful as the Aussie get all these TT jets well Canada gets it’s base hornet has premium. Heck, they even got two when first added so the base Aussie one should have premium so both nation had 1 as TT. (and this is after selling 3 US planes in a Canadian pack, the controversial Leo and NF-5 with it’s pre-order skin. oh getting the Ram II in the correct TT with the right name required giving a nation a SPAA it did have anything to do with)
I’d kill for the next air vehicle to be Johan Blue or F-35 pre WDNS
What is the meaning of this heresy
1 Like
The usual, German mains wanting the world,
2 Likes
always them
Polish subtree in the Korea tree take it or leave it
1 Like
yeah sure because turning a tree thats even bigger than the host nation tree into a sub tree makes perfect sense, I just noticed that this didn’t reply to Code after a lot of attempts to send this? Is anyone elses having these issues or is it me?
Well, second comment seeing how I watched my post get deleted seconds after posting.
I mean… have you seen the cockpit? The QA team is too busy denying legit reports. Been trying to get the AH-1G/Tzefas their rocket sights IAW the TM and the literal ballistic chart in the cockpit. Told I haven’t provided enough information on how it should look at work… which I did both AH-1G/Tzefa A/Tzefa B gunsight has no option for rockets // Gaijin.net // Issues
Just to play devil’s advocate here nearly all bombers have cockpit placeholders, the B-52H placeholder is one of the better looking ones we’ve seen at this point.
There’s atleast an attempt made to have it be close to what it should look like, unlike most of the other bombers. The B-17 for example looks nothing like what it should.
I can see why bombers have placeholders given the workload to model them fully but they are making some progress on giving them fully modelled cockpits within each major update.
I am also well aware of the state Gaijin releases aircraft cockpits in.
But the B-52H cockpit is far from the worst thing they’ve done.
1 Like