This one doesn’t appear to be a report, but a recent blog post. Whilst by itself, it would not be considered a valid source (3rd party websites and blogs are not accepted), it can be added as a supporting source to an existing report in the comments.
Dont you understand? They are saving money on the Issue team, why else would the Bug and historical error searching, which would be a task for a own team, be mostly done by the Communtiy. We are kind of the Update Testers.
(And sadly without real compensation anymore, on the old forum i got a title (which again is gone) “Active Reporter” and 1000 Ge, will we see such again or similar like 100-500 GE per implemented Report or so @Smin1080p_WT ? Or could i somehow even get my title back?)
Yea ik this is a blog not a bug report
the devs can just look at this blog and take what they need to fix the tank ut have the sources in it
Also there is planty of other bug reports
I just want to know if there is any plan to buff the merkavas
gaijin should give some rewards for making suggestions
1 Like
Hey. When the old bug report system was on the forum, those that had created an exceptionally high number of good quality reports were given a one time award of 1000 GE as a thank you for consistent high quality report submission. It was never per report, as this would generally encourage reports being made for the wrong reasons and at much lower quality simply to rush to get GE.
With the move to the CBR, the forum title became a little less relevant, but it’s something we do have in mind (to recognise those that continue to make high quality reports noted by the Devs and us).
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT Any possibility of rewarding suggestion makers? I’m not asking for GE but at least a 7 day test drive for the suggested vehicle(once implemented in game) would be nice.
Id be rich then lol. With 252 (and 7 pending).
Or getting to keep the vehicle for free, if it ends up a premium would be nice. (I mean yeah making suggestions isnt exactly something special.)
Depending on what the vehicle is, it’s something worth considering yes for sure.
5 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT good morning, Is it possible you could tell us if the MAWS and LWS Kfir C.10 was supposed to get (as stated in devblog) is intended to come? or was a mistake by devblog
Hey. The blog texts are typically written in advance with any technical details that are planned. But as the vehicles are still in development, as we note at the end of all blogs, those features are subject to change.
Currently it’s understood the aircraft may not have bad a full MAWs system, but reports with solid information that may clarify otherwise are welcome.
4 Likes
Should be regular income stream for people trying to improve the game, not just a 1 off payment that can get you 5x skins
1 Like
I mean, yeah, kind of…
Tho im also taking a try at writing on the WIKI, where authors can get some undescribed amount of GE in form of some programm. Well im still writing at 2 articles, the people working there are a great help, tho i dont understand what is cheaper for gaijin, helping randoms to write good articles, or just writing good articles on their own. Anyway. Depending on the rewards and how much fun i have at the end (because that is really time consuming and somewhat difficult) i propably will continue, and some day work the whole German tree through.
(The 2 articles are History and guide to 10,5 cm StuH 42 and 7,5 cm KwK 37 L/24, make shure to take a look when they release!)
Please post a link to them once your finished, would be nie to read :)
1 Like
Something I do wonder though about that is the rather, IDK how to put it, seemingly randomness on what/when a report will be dealt with.
As the other person posted, some can be up for months or outright ignored/told they are wrong after waiting months even though correct.
Big example would be the HE-Proxy round for the G6 as seen in this thread (1 of the latest in years of reports)
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qHoIDU4ThMo8
Nearing 2 months has video footage, heck even a pretty well watched streamer had video footage of the issue too
(timestamped to him testing it)
After using it myself, its 100% accurate as an issue and partly why I went back to the m109 because it doesnt have the issue (nor any other HE-proxy tank as i can tell).
The main issue I have though is that you can find reports on this round not correctly reacting to armour from ages back being told “no its proxy round so you are wrong” when clearly, it has had an issue.
example report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6uC4kCznjLmb
(report came after the ability to switch between impact and proxy fuse i believe?)
Its as if they just didnt even attempt to look because its been an issue since the major artillery bug where all of them had it, but the G6 was left behind. Heck you can find reports from over 2 years ago admitting the issue was known too IIRC.
Meanwhile, all around it and a few other reports, you see them being addressed within hours at times.
It just feels very much like reports can just fall through gaps extremely easily and theres no “safety net” to catch them and force them back to the top after X amount of time, at least from the outside looking in.
Will admit bias as I wait for 1 of my own reports to be looked at (my strikemaster miniguns 1 cough Community Bug Reporting System ) but still feel theres a valid issue there.
They exist, but the tiger uht reports just are in a lombo sinxe 3-4 years
any news so far? nothing? ok then why do we have 8300 Messages before the first leek is ripe?
because arguing and complaining is this topics favourite pass time whilst at the same time is smins hell
1 Like
8300 posts pretty much accounts for the 9 or so credible leaks plus about 80% of the messages being off topic