Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Hey. The blog texts are typically written in advance with any technical details that are planned. But as the vehicles are still in development, as we note at the end of all blogs, those features are subject to change.

Currently it’s understood the aircraft may not have bad a full MAWs system, but reports with solid information that may clarify otherwise are welcome.

image

4 Likes

Should be regular income stream for people trying to improve the game, not just a 1 off payment that can get you 5x skins

1 Like

I mean, yeah, kind of…
Tho im also taking a try at writing on the WIKI, where authors can get some undescribed amount of GE in form of some programm. Well im still writing at 2 articles, the people working there are a great help, tho i dont understand what is cheaper for gaijin, helping randoms to write good articles, or just writing good articles on their own. Anyway. Depending on the rewards and how much fun i have at the end (because that is really time consuming and somewhat difficult) i propably will continue, and some day work the whole German tree through.
(The 2 articles are History and guide to 10,5 cm StuH 42 and 7,5 cm KwK 37 L/24, make shure to take a look when they release!)

Please post a link to them once your finished, would be nie to read :)

1 Like

Something I do wonder though about that is the rather, IDK how to put it, seemingly randomness on what/when a report will be dealt with.

As the other person posted, some can be up for months or outright ignored/told they are wrong after waiting months even though correct.

Big example would be the HE-Proxy round for the G6 as seen in this thread (1 of the latest in years of reports)

https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/qHoIDU4ThMo8

Nearing 2 months has video footage, heck even a pretty well watched streamer had video footage of the issue too

(timestamped to him testing it)

After using it myself, its 100% accurate as an issue and partly why I went back to the m109 because it doesnt have the issue (nor any other HE-proxy tank as i can tell).

The main issue I have though is that you can find reports on this round not correctly reacting to armour from ages back being told “no its proxy round so you are wrong” when clearly, it has had an issue.

example report
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/6uC4kCznjLmb

(report came after the ability to switch between impact and proxy fuse i believe?)

Its as if they just didnt even attempt to look because its been an issue since the major artillery bug where all of them had it, but the G6 was left behind. Heck you can find reports from over 2 years ago admitting the issue was known too IIRC.

Meanwhile, all around it and a few other reports, you see them being addressed within hours at times.

It just feels very much like reports can just fall through gaps extremely easily and theres no “safety net” to catch them and force them back to the top after X amount of time, at least from the outside looking in.

Will admit bias as I wait for 1 of my own reports to be looked at (my strikemaster miniguns 1 cough Community Bug Reporting System ) but still feel theres a valid issue there.

They exist, but the tiger uht reports just are in a lombo sinxe 3-4 years

any news so far? nothing? ok then why do we have 8300 Messages before the first leek is ripe?

because arguing and complaining is this topics favourite pass time whilst at the same time is smins hell

1 Like

8300 posts pretty much accounts for the 9 or so credible leaks plus about 80% of the messages being off topic

Still, operated by US instructors, made in US, designed by US company for a country with strong military ties to the US

It operated by Singaporeans pilots not us instructor, a strike eagle design for singapore needs and a jet belong to the Republic of singapore air force

They just literally there to train that about it

It is jointly led by US and Singapore officers, and ofc F-15SG are operated by US instructors, how else did they learn how to fly the American jet?

That has a Singaporean roundel on it
image

It also has US squadron emblem from 1954, and USAF tail markings

But I don’t see how the US training them leads to you saying it should be in the US tree, again, there are enough F-15s to share, you don’t need all of them, and you won’t get all of them

3 Likes

There are their to train with them but at the end of the day it the Singaporeans who the one piloting it, there literally videos about it. Also about marking since they in America territory they have to American marking (it will make no sense to have Singaporean marking where to not even in singapore)

you guys can argue over spilt milk lol

1 Like

It’s a very American stance to take, pure self interest with no real regard for others, it’s kind of depressing that so many people are like that

6 Likes