Well… that doesn’t make it much better; it’s still a whole year! And that is a year ago- on this platform, but I remember it being talked about even back in the Old Forums!
Anyway… I won’t annoy you further with this for today, hahah. None of this is your fault, so sorry for bothering you with this. I always end up lashing out about bugs :/.
Goodnight, for whenever you go to bed (it’s kinda late so I assume soon), and, as always, thank you for the quick replies! You are a great CM and I hold you in very high esteem :) o7
(I wrote this on an earlier reply, but I edited it into this one to end the night on the more lighthearted note rather than ranting about bugs lol)
There is a general process yes and the team depends on what type of issue it is. It may go to historical consultants for further historical validation if there is a conflict with our existing sources or a lack of clarity in the sources, 3D modellers in a scheduled queue if that vehicle is due for other corrections within or existing plans or configuration teams who edit the finer details and configs.
Actually it can be quite a difference. If you are going round telling both yourself and others that an issue was properly reported and known for 6 years, that’s a significant difference both in how you influence others opinions and also form your own opinions. It becomes a tad clearer to understand things when statements like the above are used that can directly mislead people.
The issue was reported along with the Challenger 2 overhaul last year, that did address some of the longer standing issues with the tank. Naturally, any rework of the tank was not going to eradicate every last report and did in fact spawn others that also need to be reviewed. But the tank did receive significant attention last year which is why the team have also returned to other reports and tasks on other tanks since.
Sadly this is a common thing. But being spoken amount on the forum and properly reported are two separate matters.
Reminds me of the promised leopard 2 damage model rework that was promised an eternity ago, but seems to get completly ignored after it has been promised
In your last answer, you said that there is a shortage of premium equipment in the France Ground TT top ranks and that the developers are aware of this.
However, after months of hearing that they are aware of it, there is no improvement in the game.
Now we need something close to a correct answer, at least for France TT players.
Will France see new top tier premium gear in the next or June patch?
Tho saying that @Smin1080p_WT Is there any motive for removing the Israeli starter premiums as it’s an odd move since there not that many options especially for aircraft ?
Fixed as in, it got remodelled but it’s still off by a country mile?
It’s the same crap as with the Q-5L, they just do not give a flying F*** about it.
Well, to be fair, they are all still missing their spall liners, which was… the main thing, hahah.
They got to it very quickly indeed (unlike the practically abandoned Type 10s, Merkavas, etc), but they half-assed all of it, just like they did with the Challenger 2s.
Not even just those two. They got two separate BR systems for planes and just refuse to even bother with giving some their historical armaments or specifying block numbers/ model years.
Another good example would be the A-7E, where’s the AIM-9Ms for it or AGM-65.
The Kurnass 2k got mentioned, that one’s still missing Walleyes and GBU-8s, what good does it do when it can’t take TV and laser stuff together?
I could go on and on but the issue will never be adresses. Hell even new additions are half baked, look at the F-5T