AN/APG :(
I already agree with you that GMTI is missing in several radars. There’s no disagreement there. The difference however is that those radars have their reports open, while in this case the GMTI mode here was closed without an answer specific to the report itself.
@Smin1080p_WT in the mean time i am just waiting for the pzh2k to get addressed by the devs.
Seems to have largely went under radars since everything was concentratet on the eurocanards.
Its still missing its spall liner, which if the trend of spall liner reports is sth to go by seems to never get adressed even if acknowledged.
As well as missing all its real ammunition option.
Hell the researcjable french round at tier 4 is worse then uts stock round now
How about this report for the Kurnass 2000 TISEO?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/Qoscbf25HkgD
The TISEO stabilises the camera infront of the aircraft instead of tracking the locked radar target.
This issue was closed a year ago with the mod commenting that it has been fixed when actually it still is broken.
As I mentioned, we will always do what we can to nudge reports and bring them to attention where it can be done.
Many of these are too. Not just trival issues. Thats often the primary role of the its fixed series and major updates, to correct many of the longstanding and requested issues mentioned and upvoted on the CBR site. That is however also subjective to what one player may consider a “major” to them compared to another.
But to write off the entire system and say no issues of significance are corrected would not be accurate. Understandably its always easier to remember the ones that have not been than the ones that have been.
This issue was fixed and confirmed internally and on dev server from 2.29.0.63. So if the issue has not been resolved or has returned, it requires a new report.
Most issues for the Pzh 2000 that were forwarded as far as I can see were already fixed.
Of the ones remaining, there are 3 open. Spall liners (requires some further investigation, validation and then the modelling work), Shell (Suggestion) and the Incorrect reverse gear which is indeed a bug.
2 Likes
Another thing, “AN/APG” just means it’s an American fire control radar. And doesn’t even cover all US radars with a2g ability since the AN/APQ’s exist, like AN/APQ-112
I thought about tagging you on this one.
Can you gives us more clarity after 2 years?
1 Like
I know! That’s why, every Major Update and every “It’s Fixed”, I rush enthusiastically to watch the patchnotes in hopes of finding any of these fixes…
Yet, Type 10’s steering is still broken after 4 years.
Yet, Type 10 is still missing significant acceleration after 4 years.
Yet, Challenger 2 is still missing its LFP spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, all of the Chinese Top Tier MBTs are still missing their spall liners after 1 year.
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order replenishment speed is still twice as slow than it should after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform).
Yet, Challenger 2’s first-order ammunition rack is still too small after 6 years (or 1 year since it was reported on the bug reporting platform.
Yet, the Abrams series’ turret ring is still a flat 50mm thick plate after 7 years.
Yet, Merkava Mk.4’s armor is still seemingly made out of rubber after 3 years.
Yet, M1A2 SEP/SEPv2’s turrets are still underperforming after 1 year.
And a very, very long etc.
7 Likes
I just answered this above.
1 Like
Goodnight! 😴
1 Like
Oh, I just put on a washing machine cycle, I gotta stay up for a couple more hours, but I was saying goodnight just in case he was leaving soon xD
1 Like
Smin. On a scale of 1 to holy guacamoly, how game changing is the march update going to be?
4 Likes
There are more than just US radars as part of the ground mode report too. It was just a summarization of ones similar to the AN/APG-76 being discussed. Not a reflection of the only radars impacted.
2 Likes
Jup that sums it up pretty much.
Still big things that influence it a lot.
Specialy since the plz05 came with its spall liners, the whole dpall liner layout being required is a bit ridiculous and the rounds just make more sense, specialy now that the french one is redundand.
Hell some of the suggested rounds even are already on the jpn spg
Ah ok. It’s a bit confusing as saying AN/APG’s is like saying F series fighters. Imo, just saying fire control radar is more clear
Did I misse something? Whats the Issue?
Is there an flow chart that shows the process that these reports follow? Is there multiple teams internal to the company that have to review the report before implementing the report?