We’re going to hit part 2 before a devblog with possibly the shortest time between updates lol
4 Likes
hoping for new israel SPAA instead of just namer IFV.
it’s literally the most requested thing for israel ground right now and gaijin is giving us another namer without even adding another SPAA too?
4 Likes
Vogdloveb
We’re still going to be using Machbet as our best AA when Patriot and S400 are in the game.
It’s joever for us brother.
2 Likes
Then a BMD-4M drives off the edge of the Kuznetsov, floats to shore, takes a man’s wallet, then retreats to its carrier.
I asked Smin if an Israeli SPAA was in the works, and he said they’re always looking for new options.
So that leads me to think nothing is currently being worked on.
5 Likes
OH NO OH NO NO NO the sea lightning
I can’t see any lighting
2 Likes
Also can anyone see the C next to the sea ?
devblog tmr morning?
1 Like
Thursday most likely. Then not another one until next week probably.
Gaijin likes to do one Devblog then wait a little to build hype.
If it is and no teaser/dev stream this week. I wonder if they are just skipping the dev server this update or if its coming early Jan instead
You don’t need a POD on the Su-34 though because the KH-38 has a Gen 3 thermal image (don’t know if that accurate to real life considering there poor thermal imager developments in real life)
Mavericks and GBU can take upwards of minute to reach there target of which may have smoked or moved behind a building in that time. KH-38 can be launched from let’s use 15km as an example and reach the target like 3x faster than CAS from other aircraft. I’ve watched a Su-34 launch a KH-38 at me refuse to blow up to my SPAA missiles and then hit me within 10secs at a 14km range. GBU you have to stay lazing the target and because sight stabilisation doesn’t work past 20km it’s very buggy and sometimes won’t work at 14km so you have to laze the targets within pantsir range and you get shot down because the bomb takes 3 business days to hit the target 😂
Su-34 can do what it wants as a CAS aircraft unless the pilot is brain dead. They can sit out of range of all SPAA launch a missile that the time to target from ranges like 20km is like 20 seconds. It is OP and if you say “muh F-15 or muh F-16 is better CAS” you are literally coping. They both have bad tpods mavericks have a limited tracking range so most of the time lock onto the floor. GBU have to be constantly lazed and the glide bombs can’t anything and are point lock weapon useful against stuff that doesn’t move. And the time to target for all these weapons is like a slug in comparison to the KH-38.
Yes the F-15 and F-16 are good but the Su-34 is better and it’s much much easier for it to do it
3 Likes
As it does.
Well supposedly last update didnt affect this ones release window so I guess we’ll see
su_pl8b.blk (9.2 KB)
i leave here a comparison table made by general lee and the PL-8B file made by him with all the information and sources avaible in the internet for this missile. also am gonna put some comparative videos made by him too for you guys to see how the PL-8B is much likely going to perform.
6 Likes
really doesn’t look like they’ve used any passed to dev examples
2 Likes
Yup, very surprised there wasnt even a single dev post today or monday
actually, it’s just 60% faster than MAVs, and it can only fire at fixed location in 20km like mavs. it’s seeker is almost same as mavs(in target acquisition), and it will also be intercepted by SAM.
you are describing a non-existing missile
going to part 2 without any dovbleg
1 Like