no it isnt a Draken
J-35 CHINA bro not draken
I see
After this major update
I wait British Hawk for researchable, Shooting Star jet trainer/attack aircraft, early supersonic light combat aircraft and F-16 Fighting Falcon
then write J-35 and not J35
and no it isnt the J-35 either
Mitsubishi 26DMU?
2 Likes
yes
2 Likes
More real than the F-15IA that’s for sure
2 Likes
nice?? I personally don’t think I could sleep if a 1/3 jet is better than f22 when 5th gen comes
It’s Mitsubishi F-X (the 5th gen one, just to avoid confusion with ongoing 6th gen F-X / GCAP). But I see where the comparison is coming from.
Though it's a lot more distinct from the front profile thanks to the way the tail is angled
(And yes, this was intended to have the blue wave camo similar to the F-2)
5 Likes
Just fix update only?
sound changes for the Hunter engine primarily
Hmm maybe, only if the abrams are nerfed to 5.5 seconds with them.
Also we see other buffs for the worse tanks at top tier to try and off set the leo getting even stronger. I know the challangers should have a bigger ready rack and the ariette has under preforming armour
It came quite late for 5th gen, at a time when 6th gen projects were already being started by other nations. Very similar to the Type 74 tank, which also was rather advanced for its generation but came just before the world had moved on to the next. Unfortunately this is why it was eventually cancelled as well, and 6th gen development was started instead.
Though I don’t think it would be better than the F-22 in the game still, mainly since it would be very limited in weapons with no confirmed external load aside from ASMs. The only air to air loadout would be 2x AAM-5/5B in the side bays and 6x JNAAM (or 4x AAM-4/4B) in the main bays. This is about in line with the F-22s internal load, but can’t keep up with full external loadouts and with F-22 still receiving newly developed weapons like the AIM-260 and so on it would end up having superior missiles too.
Air to ground is also limited, with only two Mk.82 bombs fitting each main weapons bay (sacrificing all missiles in there, though one bomb + one missile should be possible) and 4 ASM-3s carried externally. The F-22 has more versatile options here too.
2 Likes
Sure, if tanks like the Chally 2s and Leclercs hand in their respectively lowered BRs that they got due to the Abrams having a 5 second reload.
is there a chance the Tornado GR1 might be considered for this as well?
giving it the option to either mount no LGB or IR missiles to put it at a lower BR, mount only IR missiles for a slightly lower BR and then what we currently have with the option for a posbly slightly higher BR with AIM-9 L/i’s
Should just be reverted back to 6s
1 Like
if the BR gap was larger sure but it isnt so right now the BR gap should be larger or the abrams should have a reload nerf
Never should of actually got the reload buff in the first place
1 Like
agreed but now if they are to remove it the worse tanks in the top tier bracket need to give something up apparently