Hey @Smin1080p_WT
Hope you had a good Week so far.
Could you maybe give this report a small nudge?
I know it’s a small thing but it would be awesome if someone could take a look.
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/lJBUod7PdY2O
Thanks!
The SLM never reach Mach 3 in normal conditions
It almost always tops out at Mach 2.95 depending on how high it is and how far is the target but it never reach M.3 never the less exceed it as the primary sources say at normal conditions. in this vid the target was a little under 25km away the SLM reached max speed of M. 2.95 then it start to rapidly lose it speed till the point of impact at that point it hit the target at speed of M. 1.5
1 Like
That’s because you’re shooting at targets who are low altitude. If you shoot at a high-flying target which is at 10km altitude and 20-25km away, it will reach Mach 3. Testing confirms this.
1 Like
It seems that the JAS39A is getting RB99s
Volcano Alley is the next NE map
And some changes to the M249 for INF
I saw that from the latest datamine
they had made unique MAWs and RWR a few lights should be simple…
2 Likes
Ah yes. Lights. On just under 1000 aircraft (+helicopters)
simple
3 Likes
Again these tests are at altitude not at sea level or near SL which most manufacturers take in account when demonstrating a missile maximum speed and even in the picture you send (which are parameters that will never be achieved in normal matches) the missile barely reached M.3 and not as the source suggested that it can reach speed of over beyond M.3 which it mostly suggests a max speed between M 3.1 to almost M 3.2.
I’d really love to see that: it would be really cool.
1 Like
do ww2 planes have those?
who agrees F-15EX should have aim7P (does it someone tell me?)
Gaijin takes these maximum speed values at altitude, and unless you have proof that the manufacturers state that these speeds are at sea level then your statement is baseless. Given that the missile uses lofting to engage targets, what you state doesn’t really make much sense realistically.
No, if sources state that a missile does >50G, then Gaijin will give it 50G. Or if a source states a missile does >Mach 4, then they will give it Mach 4 as the baseline, this is uniform across all missiles and what they have done for a long while already. But if you don’t believe me then just wait until you get your response to your report.
1 Like
Navy missile
…yea?
Reasonable argument sense nor me or anyone else would know the testing parameters, although it’s not my report i am still hoping for the best
1 Like
aren’t the lights already modeled the jas39D I think has a huge light on landing gear but cant be used
too bad aim7P cant be on F-15EX but not really it gets aim120D anyways
Every aircraft has those modelled.
so just put like a quick light in there with keybinds that has to be like a 1 week job for a dev team like Gaijin
So yet again it comes down on who lobbies the most then, the F-15IA shouldn’t come to the game unless this door is unlocked for everyone, at least the AESA Typhoons are being tested and rolled out as we speak.
As other have already pointed out to you and gaijin a REAL solution that exist and it’s the Singaporean F-15SG, there is currently no reason for the F-15IA to exist, especially when Israel had a new top tier aircraft added in the last update.
On the matter that updates are planned a year ahead then gaijin should of seen how bad this would look, especially when other nations get denied jet’s from there own subs too because “you already got X” if that were the case here then Israel yet again shouldn’t have seen the F-15IA.
I wanted to say my piece after everything have calmed down so not to add more fuel to the fire but it does seem like gaijin needs to step back a bit and rethink the rules.
2 Likes
f15EX needed a counter f15QA ccoulda been that counter its a real plane made better than EX but instead we got a half baked f15IA