Why would you do that? What does infantry have to do with rearming or transferring an incapacitated crew member to a friendly tank?
You told me I was crying, and told another they had spastic thoughts, so yea, you aren’t limiting your lame attempts to insult at just one person…
Deal with it.
So you and one person, and you’re not even who I said anything about replying spastically. So you’re upset over what reason again?
It’s still derogatory no matter the meaning, in the manner you used it…
It still makes your claim a lie… After all, it’s not just one person anymore.
I don’t care if it wasn’t directed at me, it shows your issue is your issue and yours alone…
It’s not. It’s a muscle spasm. Your fingers are controlled by muscles. So you read that, and your first thought was disabled people. That says more about you than anything.
It doesn’t mean I’m a liar, I didn’t insult you till after you started to reply to defend someone else when that conversation was done. You got upset over nothing.
Again, it doesn’t show my issue, or else I would’ve started out the conversation with insults or attacked anyone who disagreed with me which I haven’t. Very flawed logic.
The fact you’re trying so hard to validate your attack makes it clear you’re just going to double down over and over again because you’re trying that hard to not acknowledge that you are indeed crying…
What’s that got to do with me picking it out as the insult it genuinely is…
The fact you even had to use the term to deride someone who made a comment about the sugegstion you made, and you didn’t like shows more that you are upset enough to not think more about the words you use.
It does show your issue, that you can’t handle being pressed and actually engaged with… And that does reflect on your inability to engage, no matter how many you try claim that you have engaged with.
You’ve got a severe disability if you cannot accept this as the point being made.
And again, that isn’t anyone elses issue, other than your own.
Like, seriously, you could’ve just accepted it, made amends and made yourself better, but no, you had to make out that I was the one crying…
CRYING…
YOU are the one crying because you can’t handle a response made on your post, without trying to dig deep into that bag of insults to make an issue compared to actually having a truly civilized discussion…
Again, you’re the one crying… It’s abundantly clear that you genuinely are projecting.
If I couldn’t handle the response…… I wouldn’t be responding. No, I’m explaining what spastic is, you took it as meaning I was calling his differently abled and even the person I said that to wasn’t upset by it. You took it as a derogatory term for no reason other than to be upset. I’ve went back to the regular conversation with other people even those who disagreed with me. You’re trying to justify yourself getting so worked up over a word that was ment for muscular spasms aka spastic movement. You have turn this whole thread into complaining. I know you’re upset because if someone had such a problem with a person they wouldn’t keep responding. You have to make sure I know your feelings. You got upset over nothing. So yes, my assumption of you crying continues to be proven correct, if it wasn’t, you’d have been gone a long time ago.
Just stop.
You don’t know how forum engagement actually works then do you, and that’s not my problem. Again, that’s a you problem.
If this is true, then you are definitely upset… At least you have definite skills in projection and ignorance.
Not upset sorry, I meant what I said and not what you wanted to construed it into to. You made this forum what it is. You turned it into a topic about APCs into you didn’t like how I talked to someone. That’s solely on you. I’m not the one who keeps coming back to justify why they are upset over a post not to them. This topic would be more on track when you stop replying. So this can either be about the premise of the thread, or your continued disapproval of my response to someone.
diddums…
Deal with it.
Ok. So, with the APCs I could see them be used to resupply friendly vehicles, in a limited capacity. Just like fire extinguishers they have a limited number: so with the resupply you could have 1 or 2 before having to go to a cap point and then resupply the ICV.
With replacing incapacitated crew members on friendly vehicles it would work the same, you’d drive up and have a time frame where you both can’t move during the transfer of replacement crew and ammo.
And the point I made was about your want to have droppable infantry, which you proclaimed were in the game already, but not in the normal matches. The manner of which you are dropping a unit in on a spot, on a vehicle.
After all, that’s before you editted your post in the first place, because someone else was making points about it.
Trying to make it about anything else because of the fact you can’t address your usage of words and proclaimning that everyone else is crying for opposing this is just deceptive.
I never said droppable infantry, I originally stated a deployable AT team. That doesn’t move, you picture a spot and deploy it. Drive away and the AI attacks targets with limited ammunition. As you and I already discussed about the rating issue I remade the topic because I agreed that, that would be a lot to ask for. The second thing I brought up was using ICVs to replace incapacitated/ injured crew members and ammo. I never once brought up deployable infantry units or infantry questions. I never used the word infantry. Once someone else stated infantry and misinterpreted what I said it turned into “this isn’t a RTS”.
I mean, you could’ve just apologized and edited out what you were being called out on, but no, you had to goad at the person who merely made mention of something, and go on and on about how they were crying and how the word has a meaning, deflecting from the manner you used it.
That’d have been the sensible option here, but we’re at so many replies deep that I don’t care about your suggestion anymore because you’re that caught up on trying to validate your insult.
Bro, we are past the crying stuff. Seriously. I want to talk about the subject of the article that I made. If you didnt like how I spoke to others that were also insulting me and not letting me explain myself then I’m afraid we should part ways now.
I’m not gonna apologize. I ment every word I stated towards the people I stated it to. I did not insult the person for disagreeing with me, I insulted after many replies after realizing that the person didn’t want my explanation they just wanted to believe their assumption which I repeatedly tried to correct. If we can’t get past that, then oh well.
You haven’t said sorry yet, so no… You may want to have it disappear, but alas, that’s just you avoiding the point.
You only want positive things said about that which you have suggested, and that’s not how this works.
Again, that’s just you trying to avoid the issue YOU made…
Well, I meant every word that I said, in that you are deflecting, projecting and crying, all at the same time.
There wouldn’t be a need for you to puff yourself up by throwing those insults out, if you had actual discussion skills.
You may want to brush those up.
Except everything was going fine having discussions before that. Even in the middle when I tried to explain what I meant continuously. Even after I altered the subject to get rid of the confusion that person continued to respond saying how I was incorrect in my thinking. I tried multiple times to restart the original conversation. He didn’t disagree once and then I jumped to insult him.
Nope… Just stop.