I’m not gonna say sorry, so I don’t know what you’re hoping for. You claim I don’t know how to communicate yet am trying to get back to the original conversation. You want to make this thread about your feelings. If you can’t get past it and attempt to have a conversation about the topic then this isn’t going anywhere
It’s my thread, so no. Again I tried to restart the original conversation and you refused. So this is solely on you.
If you weren’t upset you’d not be continuing to reply… That’s your words.
I wouldn’t be replying if it want my thread. You are on here to solely continue to conversation of something besides the topic. This is solely on you. If you created a thread and I refused to leave, you could use that example as well.
‘It’s my party and I’ll cry if I want to’
I’m relying in the hope of actually taking about the subject. You’re not. So you’re replying solely on emotions knowing you won’t talk about the topic.
Why did you quote that? Never once did I state that. You’re the one that wants to continue talking about that, so if a parent tells a child to stop but they continue, that child is then throwing a tantrum and crying. So using that example that is exactly what you are doing
Oh I spoke about the topic, but you also didn’t like what I said then… I then picked on your being so upset about someone posting that you used the term spastic in terms of thier thoughts, not about them commenting, and you then brought it into this whole ‘you’re crying’ nonsense that it devolved into…
It wasn’t a quote, it’s a song lyric, which is apt to this situation that you’ve brought upon yourself.
I liked what you said and that’s why I modified the topic. Becuase I agreed with you premise. Sure I didn’t agree fully but I didn’t insult you due to us not seeing eye to eye. It took you to look at other replies to other people to find insults.
“ “ those are quotations, aka, quotes. Which make no sense in this conversation. If you are quoting a song you still wouldn’t need quotations. Also I guess that would make sense if I was the least big upset but I’m not. I’m trying to get past this and actually talk about the topic.
And I don’t care that you liked what I said, and to put it forth as a reason why I shouldn’t call you out is just plain ignorant of what’s being said.
It doesn’t take anything but reading the thread to find this… so it’s not like I searched or picked them out… They’re there as part of the thread…
This is just hilarious… I’m sorry but you really need to get some discussion skills…
Then admit that you are the one upset, because I am absolutely not crying by commenting on your dumb thread…
You keep bringing up discussion skills but you’re the only one who continues to ruin the discussion. You did search through because we were done talking, our conversation ended hours before you decided to reply again. So yes, you searched through to get upset. You continue to ruin the conversation. I’m not gonna apologize. I’m not sorry for anything I stated. I don’t care if you like I agreed with you. I’m only stating at the time what happened. You’re the one that wants to continue bringing up how you feels in trying to get back to the topic. So you’re clearly upset. If I was upset I would attempt to apologize, I’m not going to
I never once mentioned that in the ending of this thread… If anything I only made that statement to stop you from trying to attack me.
What absolute nonsense. What even is this garbage you’re trying to peddle here?
By no means was it ‘ended’ let alone ‘hours’ prior… The fact you don’t want to admit the fault you’ve done by consistently being abusive and ignorant to discussion, makes it clear you’re just arguing for the sake of it.
It’s almost like you think that debating is arguing and that you have to get someone to submit to your position otherwise they are worthy of your abuse.
That’s the brass tacks of it… There is no need to attack people directly other than their argument. That’s where your usage of spastic was nothing to do with the true meaning of it, just you throwing an insult at someone trying to make an issue of them daring to have an opposing stance.
This shows as a trait in your replies because everything counter to you, you classed as crying, and that’s factually incorrect, and arrogant.
Aside from being moronic, it’s about as septic as the stance can be because you were the one throwing that shade out, and that’s what your thread delvolved into.
Your naive attempts to stem the criticism by saying that you agreed with someone prior, is just bad faith because it’s nothing at all to do with aligning with you, it’s the discussion that comes from accepting anothers stance compared to trying to move the goalposts and make out things weren’t as what’s been portrayed.
And when you google anti-tank team and check images, this is the sort of thing that comes up…
How quiant…
I thought we could replace a crew member in a friendly capture zone (if the module is unlocked). I think it works outside of the capture zone in arcade. 1 time instance. Does anyone recall?