Once again, you are repeating the same points without any solid justification as to why either of them should be added. Capture Points furfill=supply trucks ideas and such and players can repair others or turn out the fires for them. If they wish to do so.
“let’s add anti-tank guns or other types of AT weapons” Yeah as if that’s gonna work, You’re not the first to think it was a good idea. Which it isn’t, the more I realize.
Now we can keep trying to go back and forward however it’s very damn clear that you only want to hear what you want to hear not what other people have to say and trust me when I say this flying has done this before, there are things I don’t agree that he has said and other times I have agreed. We have also had our fair share of staring into these echo chambers. That does not serve any purpose.
So with that @Pacifica, I need to stop pinging you as my default feels like it’s getting annoying. But overall, this thread has become nothing more than a back-and-forward swing.
And I admitted the AT team wouldn’t work so bring it up constantly makes no sense. It’s as subject that’s done with.
Yes you can use capture points but capture points still don’t replaced injured crew members nor can you resupply outside capture points. So you’re in a position that is far away from a capture point or all capture points are taken by the enemy. Then allowing a friendly APC to come reapply you with ammo and replace injured crew members fixes that issue. You’re in an SPAA and can’t make it to a capture point, call a friendly APC. It’s a pretty simple concept.
Then that’s your problem. If you weren’t overextending you wouldn’t be out of ammo, hell I run with 15-30 rounds depending on the vehicle. I rarely have run out of munitions.
How else are conversations done then with back and forth? Most of this thread is about a subject that was done with in the beginning but one person kept on pushing their interpretation.
Congrats to you. But other people do. There are some people that go through whole rounds not using crew replacement or a fire extinguisher. But you aren’t everyone. SPAA especially can easily run out of missiles mid game.
Mate this i what a back and forward is, you keep pushing your idea even when people say it’s completely a skill issue on your behalf.
The fact that you don’t know how to go in reverse, or how to play defend the capture point means you’re dying constantly due to you wanting to over extent while everyone else isn’t trying to. It’s situational awareness, you act on how you see the battlefield not how you want to. Now I’m done with this cause we are not going to go anywhere and i doubt anyone else wants to talk either. Since you are just gonna respond with the same bulletin points.
You’re the first person to say skill issue anything. If you don’t like the idea that’s your position. But saying it’s useless solely because you would rarely use it is idiotic. Again, this is the first time I’ve had a back and forth about the ICVs being used as a rearmament platform so whatever you keep saying the back and forth is about I have no clue.
I feel you use too many words that you don’t understand because you’ve seen them used elsewhere and you think they’re cool.
Spastic, idiotic, crying, ‘genius’, all this negtive nonsense… Just plain out makes you to be projecting because you’ve got no true engagement skills in this area.
And as I said, I don’t care if you thought I was cool or that you supported me at any stage, I’m confident enough I don’t need to have that situation… Unlike you.
You don’t need to have the situation where you can have a decent conversation? At no point did I think you’re cool or anything like that. I said I can respect you because you were being respectful. You again, look at a conversation that had nothing to do with you, to justify yourself getting upset. I never once insulted or demeaned you. You had to go through the comments, to find something to upset you. So why you chose to do that is a mystery. Why would I use words I don’t understand. Wouldn’t that mean I’m using them incorrectly if I don’t understand their meaning? Please, quote where I insulted you, no another commented, but you specifically.
You’re the one saying I’m crying because you lack any other option other than to be abusive and ignorant to the point.
Never said you insulted me, I’m directly calling out your dumb vocabulary and limited engagement.
Using spastic as a term to insult is absolutely a dumb move.
How is using the word spastic a dumb move? So you’re upset by what then? I said you were defending someone else which you denied but then quote passages I said to them not you. I respectfully listened and responded to criticism, you’re a prime example of that. So what is your goal? No one here but you is upset because you had to search through a whole comment threat to find something to be upset by. What limited engagement or dumb vocabulary, you have yet to expand on those topics besides saying you don’t like them. So explain how.
Again, I’m not upset… How thick are you to the point that someone can call you out on using those terms and being insulting to others whilst you’re still trying to pass it off as a discussion, or even a conversation…
You’re the one throwing those terms out, so you are the one who is upset, and you are the one crying about it.
As I said, you using those terms to insult those who opposed you is what is evident by the usage of those words being all you can muster…
Because they do nothing at all to the conversation other than allow you to get hooked up on who calls you out about them and you then lay back into this ‘you’re crying’ nonsense…
That’s how genuinely idiotic this thread has become.
If you hadn’t used those terms, and become so agressive, and ignorant to the points being made in the first place, then you wouldn’t have half the responses in this thread, but because you maintain this method of proclaiming that everyone else is crying but you, it’s painfully obvious that you’re the only one actually crying.
If you need burn-aid, I’ll call you the waahmbulance if you need, but I don’t think it’ll arrive on time…
Pretty sure that leaves this settled to be honest.
Spastic isn’t a derogatory term, it’s literally a spasm of a muscle which his fingers spastically typings due to anger. I only directed this at one person. You are assuming that anyone that disagreed I talked to this way which isn’t true in the slightest and can be shown in this threat. You and two others including the dude you’re defending are the reason this threat has turned into this. Being offended by nothing, misinterpreting even after explanations. You three have solely made this comment thread what it is. I wanted to discuss IFVs and how to utilize them more in game, my first idea didn’t pan out but I think my second of using them to rearm friendlies still has potential. But you continue to turn this comment thread into you being upset.
Not in the slightest. You got upset over nothing and turned this thread into randomness. My insults towards one person ended at that person and even talking to other I didn’t insult them if they disagreed with my ideas.
You’re mistaken and repeatedly been informed that you are wrong every time you’ve mentioned that, so therefore you are genuinely delusioned in your ability to actually have a discussion, thus, you’re beyond hope or reason of having any engagement with.
Doesn’t matter. And you’re also lying because it wasn’t just that one person, you’ve been getting mad this entire end of the discussion as you’re trying to insult me by saying I’m crying…
More lies… That’s definitely derogatory…
Yeah, and only IFV’s or APC’s can capture points with infantry. AND OMG, TANKS CANT PROVIDE THEIR ACTUAL ROLE, SUPPORTING IFV ASSAULTS AND INFANTRY!
Show where I said other than one person that they were crying. How am I wrong? Explain. You’re saying stuff without backing it with proof solely because I insulted someone other than you.