At the moment the only thing that has seemed good to me in the changes has been that of the T-54, finally they have put the 47 below the 49 and 51, the only thing is that to make it more historical I would leave the 47 with the BR412B, to the 49 and 51 the BR412D and leave them to the 47 in 7.3 and the other two in 7.7, and add the T-54A with the HEAT-FS.
There are literally dozens of vehicles at 7.3 & 7.7 that are amazing.
M48, Maus, T32E1, M47, M103… to name a few.
Facts aren’t “delusional” no matter how many times you claim otherwise.
Gaijin gave decompression, which is exactly what we asked for.
All they did was decompress 6.7-7.7 and gave the compression to another br. It isn’t entirely what we asked for. They gave a crumb and we asked for bread but you are happy to keep that crumb and starve yourself.
Nope, they decompressed 10.3 as well.
10.7 is also soft-decompressed since people bring 12.0 CAS into top battles.
Yea really cool they decompressed a br with 6 10.7s in the entire game now there is only 3 10.7s now. Oh how cool is that.(Sarcasm btw)
guys since they moved the M1A1 and IPM1 to 11.0 they are totally useless, their bullets struggle to penetrate T-80s and all the top tier range they are up against. in this way it is equivalent to having them nerfed, you have to ask that they put them back as before, or that they give a buf to the damage because you can’t play anymore, and it’s the umpteenth time that they nerf the USA
USA is not nerfed.
Half of T-80U can be penned by M1A1.
IPM1 struggles more cause M900 doesn’t compete as well as M829A1, but T-80s usually show themselves like this to me:
And that idler wheel is an ammo rack.
1 Like
I gotta look at my spreadsheet real quick…
M900: 562mm
3BM60: 616mm
Aight, with that we can do a bit of comparison.
T-90A is slow, big turret weakspots like IPM1 as T-90A has the biggest breach weakspot of all Soviet tanks, reloads 2.1 seconds slower.
BUT, it has a higher generation of thermals as a minor improvement, a superior round as a rather good improvement, and a solid UFP. APS matters against ATGMs, but M1 doesn’t fire those.
HOWEVER, T-90A should probably be brought up to 11.0. I still won’t play T-90A since T-90M doesn’t exist for me to use the spading bonuses of T-90A on, but it going to 11.0 won’t hurt.
And I’m defending this because I’ve been playing IPM1 since it released in WT with most recent battle within the last week in my 11.7 lineup since it’s my primary backup to my M1A2.
IPM1 should’ve been made 11.0 when 11.3 was made 11.7.
BTW, calling people names for saying T-90A might need to be 11.0 indicates you might like Soviets a bit too much.
Friend you can publish all the graphs you want, but the fact remains that the bullet is completely nullified, often it even ricocheted sideways with the vulnerable part exposed, don’t come and tell me bullshit that it is full of weak points, because it is one thing to test ballistics at the hangar one thing is the reality of the facts in battle, and what they do behind the scenes, they surely are not telling you
Back when HEATFS had 650mm of flat pen [I don’t remember its angled pen], I was exclusively using that against T-80Us.
I’d hit their towing hook on their UFP to ammo rack them up to 1000 meters away in Type 90.
& you can still hit that towing hook position with M829A1.
this is if you have a good shooting position and the player is practically sleeping. but often you find them at close range and you have only one attempt, and always the lower front, and if you hit them at a 45° angle on the track the projectile enters and hits the hold and the tank explodes, at least with the Russians it used to work like this, now magically it doesn’t work anymore. but then the problem is not only with the Russians, the problem is also with the top tier leopards, who practically do not even notice that I have shot at them. they screwed up putting the M1A1 at 11.0 including the IPM1
If it’s close range, idler wheel or side armor.
Cause they can’t show only their front armor coming around a corner.
BTW, IPM1 & M1A1 were 11.0 less than 8 months ago.
When top BR was 11.3, they were 10.7.
Nothing changed cause they’re still effective tanks.
Yeah. Looks like you’re getting good matches & showcasing skill.
Winrates are out of the control of most players… but playing against Germany, it’s funny because they don’t have 7.3 anymore, all they got is a 7.3 Wiesel, seems fair.
What does US have? A single T32?
Japan is a joke anyways, horribly overtiered Ho-Ri.
China? Nothing.
Italy? Nothing.
Sweden? Nothing.
And Russia a BTR I suppose.
Yeah all skill, definitely not the only nation with an extremely powerful lineup whilst all the others are gutted or deleted.
1 Like
Which means you get 7.7 matches instead.
You only need 4 top tier vehicles to make a game.
Look you don’t have to teach me how to play, I’ve been playing this game for 10 years, I know how to shoot a tank, the point is that the bullets have become ineffective since the update
1 Like
You mean the volumetric bullet disaster?
Calling realism that WoT had since 2013 is a disaster?
Pixel wide “bullets” was horrible & entirely unbalanced.