Su-33 is actually slightly, and I mean very slightly, heavier than the su-30 and only gets its “extra thrust” up to 300 km/h. Now that being said I have to disagree about the 33 sucking, I love the flanker airframes if your smart you can take most fights but the issue with the 33 is all the low levels that see the AOA button and spam it off rip. I love to use the 33 in dogfights against other flankers as most of them use the funny button way to soon or at the worst times, even against someone who knows not to spam it, it still holds its own
can mods just close this? they did it to the other post he made before for the same reason
1 Like
Buff the 120 and all the radars to their respective irl performance
3 Likes
b-but his su27sm wont perform any goooood :(((
If that’s how it was in real life…😟. I guess it is just skill issue on the soviet side
1 Like
Seeing that you never even touched an F16 especially not the belgian one i do urge you to play it, cause it really is misserable. Although i disagree with the post itself of the Aim120 being too OP, not having any means to anything BVR 13.0 makes you a base bomber if you want to grind and that imo shouldnt be the case
I guess we had better also get rid of the double R-77/R-77-1 racks that never existed too.
3 Likes
tbh i wouldnt mind, fox 3 meta is fairly well balanced and enjoyable partly for that reason and i say that as a well below average player
yeah its just the best 13.0 no biggie
SU-33 its amazing. By far the most fun to play of the Flankers
1 Like
They then would have to ungimp all the other fox 3s, most notably; aam-4, PL-12 and Mica EM.
Seems like both the R-77 and 77-1 are pretty gimped too.
2 Likes
Mica EM is already been “ungimped” it’s the only one of the modern ARH that has a unique seeker and is far harder to notch than the others which all share a seeker.
They really need to now do the same for all others and give them all unique seeker performance
5 Likes
I mean yea, but afaik it is also missing a lot of range
3 Likes
This is just an issue with most missiles in WT, some like SRAAM are only half their actual range
They all are. Even AMRAAM is strictly speaking missing quite a bit of performance at long range. We have 3 or 4 reports for It being far more effective at long range than it is Vs targets maneuvering
2 Likes
I think this is slightly different.
SRAAM was modeled with the best available information at the time and simply never got updated when new information was found.
I think with all BVR missiles (SARH and ARH) the code fails and a lot of missiles loose a lot of range through things like drag and wobble. Far more than they should. I’d guess that every ARH missile is underperforming by roughly the same amount in terms of range
1 Like
they should stop kneecaping aircraft and weapons just because they dont like them for all nations
1 Like
missiles wobble way too much in wt its crazy
They kneecap them for balance, though sometimes they do too much
it ends up being unbalanced in the end anyway why not give nations similar systems at the same time