Nerf AIM-120A/B

If that’s how it was in real life…😟. I guess it is just skill issue on the soviet side

1 Like

Seeing that you never even touched an F16 especially not the belgian one i do urge you to play it, cause it really is misserable. Although i disagree with the post itself of the Aim120 being too OP, not having any means to anything BVR 13.0 makes you a base bomber if you want to grind and that imo shouldnt be the case

I guess we had better also get rid of the double R-77/R-77-1 racks that never existed too.

3 Likes

tbh i wouldnt mind, fox 3 meta is fairly well balanced and enjoyable partly for that reason and i say that as a well below average player

yeah its just the best 13.0 no biggie

SU-33 its amazing. By far the most fun to play of the Flankers

1 Like

They then would have to ungimp all the other fox 3s, most notably; aam-4, PL-12 and Mica EM.

Seems like both the R-77 and 77-1 are pretty gimped too.

2 Likes

Mica EM is already been “ungimped” it’s the only one of the modern ARH that has a unique seeker and is far harder to notch than the others which all share a seeker.

They really need to now do the same for all others and give them all unique seeker performance

5 Likes

I mean yea, but afaik it is also missing a lot of range

3 Likes

This is just an issue with most missiles in WT, some like SRAAM are only half their actual range

They all are. Even AMRAAM is strictly speaking missing quite a bit of performance at long range. We have 3 or 4 reports for It being far more effective at long range than it is Vs targets maneuvering

2 Likes

I think this is slightly different.

SRAAM was modeled with the best available information at the time and simply never got updated when new information was found.

I think with all BVR missiles (SARH and ARH) the code fails and a lot of missiles loose a lot of range through things like drag and wobble. Far more than they should. I’d guess that every ARH missile is underperforming by roughly the same amount in terms of range

1 Like

they should stop kneecaping aircraft and weapons just because they dont like them for all nations

1 Like

missiles wobble way too much in wt its crazy

They kneecap them for balance, though sometimes they do too much

it ends up being unbalanced in the end anyway why not give nations similar systems at the same time

Because it depends on the vehicle they want to add, the potential gap it could fill in a certain nation, how they would implement it…

id rather them not implement things that aren’t going to be represented well if they decide to just kneecap something like a plane missing features it had when other airframes in game have the same features already implemented it just doesn’t make any practical sense

Sure as long as it doesn’t become op and doesn’t break the game’s balance.

They can’t lower it until they fix the 50m tall mega trees.

1 Like