Naval mode is finally dead

[ParryACO-psn]

@NullDelta

why can’t they sort matchmaking, one team with 2x 6.0 heavy cruisers and nothing on the other side higher than 5.7

Depending what your 5.7s are, this isn’t a big power gap.

However I am in agreement the matchmaker should force an even number of same tier/type vehicles (ie 4 6.0 CAs and 2 6.0 battleships) on each team (so it’s 2 and 1 vs 2 and 1).

Nothing is more cringe than one team having two nassau classes and all we get is a fargo and a mikuma.

Granted, the japanese heavy cruisers in general don’t struggle with punching well above their weight despite being fairly awful hulls (at least they’re not krasny kavkaz or kirov classes…)

[굴러온]

@ParryACO-psn

However I am in agreement the matchmaker should force an even number of same tier/type vehicles (ie 4 6.0 CAs and 2 6.0 battleships) on each team (so it’s 2 and 1 vs 2 and 1).

Nothing is more cringe than one team having two nassau classes and all we get is a fargo and a mikuma.

That should be solved by decompression.Nassau should be like at least 6.7 when Fargo and Mikuma are 6.0

[Kweedko]

go vote

Naval matchmaking need some improvements

Several easy improvements to naval battle matchmaking, what could be done to enrich player experience: Return small map variants (from before where spawn points were pushed back) to the rotation for low Battle Ratings (BR 6.3 and below). Return to rotation the maps that were completely removed: South Africa, both variants of Southern Kvarken in Domination mode, Aleutian Islands for large ships, Southern Kvarken and Aleutian Islands in Encounter mode, as well as Southern Kvarken and Aleutia…