No its fine , leave it where it is.I dont care about ARB ,I play GRB and the Wyvern is almost vital for the UK line up
1 Like
So bad you’re then:
Here is the average players being registered on Thunderskill for the last month:
https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/689902570172710959/1200518336786747443/Screenshot_20240126_201049_Chrome.jpg?ex=65c678d4&is=65b403d4&hm=638e8804c534f9e48d22b4d54d5f888d1b6029cae5f02f742006d845c324e3f5&
For real: the stats are good enough to justify a BR up to 5.0
70+ Win rate, and 1.6 KD,… and this with players like you being that bad → average vehicule at 70%+ Win rate is not really what we can call “average”
1 Like
“Hello, my name is MiG-21F-13 / PFM / MiG-21S(R3R),… are we a joke to you?”
You may not catch them in full speed, yet it really easy to get in those down with early MiG-21’s
1 Like
Only if the 104 is an idiot or bombing bases. I challenge you to show me a 9.3br jet that can catch the F-104. I want some hope for my nonafterburning/nonsupersonic 9.0 jets.
1 Like
Lightning F6 :P
2 Likes
For some reason TS aggregate stats are not accurate to the actual state of a vehicle. They also don’t reflect the stats of the vehicle being played in ground or air. Look - it says more air frags per battle than air frags per death, which is mathematically impossible.
The last time anything official was added to that site was 3 years ago. It is definately a questionable source.
Those are too rare sadly.
Yeah true. Though thats because they broke Red Tops and wont fix them or buff them.
At a minimum they could have double their current range and be more effective in side aspect. But they should in fact be essentially all-aspect (all based upon submitted and acknowledged bug reports with primary sources). Thats ontop of them sometimes just straight up missing easy shots well within range.
Fix that, many players, myself included, would probably play the Lightning so much more (yes I would expect a smal BR increase will all-aspect Red Tops)
1 Like
Somehow Gaijin can’t code separate GRB BR’s to allieviate ARB’s unfun BR’s.
2 Likes
So many balancing issues could be fixed in an instant if they simply had seperate BRs.
6 Likes
Well it needs to before it starts destroying 4.3 Ground line ups to appease people in a separate game. Another Gaijin foul up at the base level
show me a 10.0 jet that can catch f104…
1 Like
Even bricks can work if flown well - as for the BR it matters not - you don’t pay attention, even bricks from 5km out will get you.
1 Like
So 9.0 should suffer while you can just run from everything? At least up there better missiles can catch you so you get to feel what the rest of us feel.
Well, its coming, lets hope they dont screw it up
Based on that fact said it’s only for some attack aircraft, I’m thinking it will be limited to high tiers only.
Yeah, not all will get different BRs, for example A-10s and Su-25Ks arent going to go anywhere with their current loadouts but aircraft like the jaguars and Tornados can come down. That being said, I dont think its limited to just high tier.
Im hoping stuff like the Lancasters can come down a little bit, also its means that aircraft, to keep it on topic, like the Wyvern could move up in ARB without being nerfed into the ground for ground or naval. I reckon 3/4 of ground attackers/bombers could move but 1/4 cant due to compression issues.
Not too mention it opens the door for aircraft we dont even have yet. A bomber mosquitto (no guns) could be Br 2 or 3 in ARB, but the 4k Cookie would be OP in GRB and force a BR of like 4 or 5. With seperate BRs it doesnt matter
And what about Fighters that are perfect as Attackers? From their own terminology Fighters (and sometimes Interceptors and Bombers) will not be effected, only those they deemed as “Strike/Attackers”, which is often just a Gaijin decision.
I’m still pretty they’re going only to apply it to high tiers. I honestly see them using this as an excuse to add more advanced CAS load outs that they’ve been holding back.
1 Like