My spell check was most insistent sorry
The point is it was fine at 4.7 too, back then (of course things change).
1 Like
Of im uptierd im playing at 5.3 anyway
Yeah, I meant as in the bracket involved too.
I’d rather be in a Wyvern at 5.7 (for example) than the mk 24 at 8.0 (before the alterations recently); I prefer the uptier capability of the Wyvern, personally.
I believed this is more about AirRB and its effects there. I used the Typhoon in GFRB not the Wyvern for GF personally. So where I was coming from was AirRB (since in their GFRB plan BR for GF will seperate) and not the lower use of GFRB (GFRB being not as populated than most other modes) and I think most here are relating to its BR in AirRB.
Absolutely fine ,I play GRB so presumed it was all about that ,my bad. I do believe Gaijin were looking into separate BR for both games?
As you say, BR position in GF is less relevant to “results”. Wyvern just happens to be GBs earliest 2 drop prop.
1 Like
I’m not being rude. That’s the sad reality of most bomber/attacker team exploiters.
Fighter scrub usually improves over time and tries to win.
Bomber/attacker dudebros deliberately drag their team down
What a ridiculous statement.
3 Likes
Sure, exploiters. We just don’t need to focus on them is all, as I wasn’t.
It’s hard to call a “be useless and keep losing unless the team carries you” a legit playstyle.
Just like knife + glock is not really a proper CS GO playstyle, even though of course you can do that in every game, along with flashbanging your own team, because why the hell not.
B-25’s only role is an easy kill.
As a bomber I can impact the ticket bleed.
Certain maps have objectives that can dictate the outcome of the match, some of which can only be achieved by a bomber or attacker.
As a bomber I can kill other players.
As a bomber I can occupy the enemy while my team climbs to get an advantage.
Scrubs can play all types. I know you are being very specific but just not totally helpful in discussion which is more general.
I sure do wish we were all aligned regarding “team” but this is reality and beyond “exploiters” the differing players will always muddy how this turns out.
He is being super specific I believe, so really a sub set of certain plane use.
Bomber has minimal impact on tickets. Also ticket wins are something that just happens. Unlike fighter on fighter.crime, you can’t really plan around it, because of vastly different attacker capability and amount between the 2 teams - it’s basically a norm.
Any counter-attacker gameplan is by default wrong and actually greatly inceeases chances of.losing the PvP aspect.
So outside of select few planes (that basically break the game if used right) it’s just not worth it to pursue tickets or enemy attackers.
I have over 400 games in Wyvern. Around 1100 air to air kills. And 20 ground kills with 80% WR.
I think the mode needs a redesign, instead of trying to “balance” attackers and bombers and “giving them a fighting chance”.
you’ve lost me now.
Have no idea what your talking about.
1 Like
He plays a certain way.
To him it is the only way anyone should, contrary to the game.
I help.my team and I’m using playstyle that actually works instead of one that clearly doesn’t.
And I do that also, has it occurred to you that maybe it’s just that YOU lack the ability to be useful in anything other than a fighting capacity.
And myself and others are simply more versatile than you.
2 Likes
Dude show me the results and then we’ll talk. Your AD-2 vs my AD-2. Your AD-4 vs mine. Your Wyvern/Do-335 vs mine. Your Fw 190 F8 vs my Fw 190 F8. And then we’ll talk about “versatility”. If “versatile” means ineffective, you’re just sabotaging your team.
Also my dog would be able to “skillfully ground pound” in WT, so even trying to make an argument to somehow treat GP as equal to PvP is ridiculous.