I can use the opportunity to catch up with you: Could you bring a roundup of the things that have been sent in for suggestions regarding F-2.?
(I’m already following the repots, it would be nice to list the ones that weren’t passed on to the devs)
Don’t forget Yak-141, F-16AJ, Maus, Heavy tank no.6… The list goes on…
1 Like
Since a lot of suggestions are being deflected on the community bug reporting page, I went ahead and made a Dev Server thread for people to show their support in maybe getting more features added to the F-2A
(yes, I am aware that some of the suggestions posted might be ahistorical, but I’m remaining impartial and leaving all options open to suggestion)
11 Likes
Thailand itself has both C-5 and C-7 for gripen or F-16a eMLU for other options
1 Like
for BVR (which is the meta ig), its better to have 6+ Missiles so you can defend against incoming Fox 3s or overwhelm an enemy. but yeah i use 4+4 on the F-15J(M) too
1 Like
Sniper model now dev, still not usable
FM changes
Spoiler
Spoiler
Its an insignificant nerf to the sustained turn rate (less than half a degree per second), whats more noticable is that the plane loses more energy in a turn now. In exchange, we get more aoa and +1G of pull. Flaperons now deploy with pitch inputs too.
11 Likes
The pylons now also don’t clip with the flaperons anymore.
Zero of those vehicles are service vehicles, thus not comparable to F-2A.
The eye of sauron is nothing against this combination XD
5 Likes
What is and isn’t a valid source can vary depending on what Gaijin wants it to be. Sometimes it’s just a ‘‘obvious marketing lie’’, sometimes it is a worthy source.
Double pods truly Japanese technology XD
2 Likes
question: does the F-2 have a missle approach warning system?
That is why I criticize 6 ASM and argue for 6 MRM: it is arbitrary after all.
By what can be found online J/ASQ-2 IEWS is capable of detecting, classifying and autonomosly defending from incoming threats but since system is classified there are not “enough” proof for gaijin
3 Likes
JASDF is pretty strick on technical markings, even when it comes to limited time liveries in absolutely most cases all markings are kept in place so I doubt marking for ASM would just randomly be on a pylon that not supposed to carry it. I know you can argue that IRL they never seen carry ASM on stations 5/7 but I have counter argument called operational necessity. Like Su-27 is not supposed to carry AIM-120 or Hammers yet Ukrainian flankers do and it is far from carrying 2 more missiles that are normal weapon for aircraft in question
1 Like
only reason Kh-38MT is in the game (iirc) and now has GNSS
3 Likes
Well, Х-38МТ is Russian missile, you know how it works
2 Likes
Spoiler
spaded stats in case anyone was wondering (with full aa loadout)
1 Like