In this way, the pamphlet is adopted as a historical document through a counterargument that is not a refutation.
Yeah, but unlike brouchures this technical markings are linked to maintenance and pilot manuals
1 Like
Any reports accepted
It is not a historical document to interpret it however you like.
Right now M61A2 weights only 102 kg, for comparison M61A1 is 500 kg
2 Likes
Is the cannon change just x-ray or did the F-2 really shave ~400 kg, aka buff to FM, along with the other FM changes which seem to be buffs overall
1 Like
Do you think there will be a pre-order for the F-2A ADTW?
It also has a higher firerate - 6600 RPM compared to 6000 RPM.
1 Like
I doubt it because difference should be only 20 kg (112 to 92 kg), I think they just forgot that ammo also weights a lot
1 Like
From futher research on J/ASQ-2 I hit a wall. From all sources I found, all of which are at best secondary, non has any concrete details. In general it doesn’t really has MAWS, at least it cannot be proved, but it can identify incoming radar guided missile and deploy CMs as well as jam hostile radar sources. J/APR-4A RWR is seems to be pretty similar to base model just fully digital and with better CPU (tho I think there are RWR antennas on bottom side of the F-2). So it is faster and probably more preciese, but by all accounts it is still C-J band only. Mainly it was modernised to be integrated with J/TEWS of the F-15J
1 Like
Its just Wiki.
Yay, ME is here, now to correct the minor issue of it adding deployment to MLC instead of taking the higher value, which is causing more drag then it should.
4 Likes
Always? Its a direct manufacturer claim. We’ve always accepted manufacturer brochures.
3 Likes
Tell that to the bug report moderator who was claiming that my JMOD TRDI papers didn’t count as a primary source for the AAM-4, even though they’re the ones who designed the missile, lmao.
28 Likes
I’m pretty sure it is not true, at least not always, but there are people who can explain it in much better details
I’m really curious as to what’s taking them so long to implement the ASM-2 seeker…
I dying to know what the finalized capability will be like
I believe you are missing the context to what I replied to. But yeah, I know none of those are service vehicles.
BUT if you want “what if” service vehicles, I believe the Rafale in game shouldn’t be able to carry 8 MICAs, since that’s only an export option iirc.
2 Likes
Thank you mitsubishi Japan for deadass having pitch response information charted out in publicly available documents (it even includes relevant altitude and speed information)
15 Likes