Sounds like a good description of the Thai air line tbh
Rejoice, F-18s get a cobra button, and Oxy on the dev stream stated other aircraft like the F-16 will be getting it as well.
That means F-2A should be getting a mode that allows for greater maneuverability!
4 Likes
BVVD stated on the russian dev stream that there is no F-2 planned for this patch, “possibly this year”.
10 Likes
Outdated plane is more outdated
Cool
6 Likes
sad😔
All is lost…
4 Likes
Rip
1 Like
Maybe they’re confusing Mitsubishi F-2 with Mitsubishi X-2? There’s just no other reason.
It’s gonna be fun xdd
“F-2 was never planned for this update”
https://www.youtube.com/live/tOOL_0OuIG8?si=zo3y_QXeyAJfKPCx&t=1546
1 Like
… after a while
7 Likes
Well guess im sitting out this patch or just going to hunt SU-30 and F/A-18 if i ever see them appear infront of me
They better let us use the ASMs like Kh-38s just to throw us a bone or something…
If it’s gonna be kinda mid at A2A meta, just give us really good CAS capability to compensate
2 Likes
If they doesn’t want to add F-2A so bad, thry should at least consider adding AAM-5’s to the current F-15. Thrust vectoring short range rockets could be nice to be seen.
And then they would have to put it at 15.0 since AAM-5B has LOAL, IIR seeker with insane IRCCM and about triple the range of other IR missiles we currently have (except for R-27Ts).
1 Like
It really sucks that Gaijin can’t get its act together to deliver a plane that should’ve come immediately after the abomination that’s the F-16AJ.
We are very unlikely to get the F-2 late, so now we have to wait again for an F-2 with only four JDAMS, probably NO ASM-2s at all, AIM-7s instead of AAM-4, no Sniper pod, etc.
I seriously don’t understand their problem.
3 Likes
With the dev server open, there is still no F-2. Big rip
Probably?))
Tbh looking how F-2 is outdated, the ASM-3 is already needed as 3 machs JDAM
6 Likes
If we do get ME and the ability to turn off G limiters that could be very powerful.
In ME mode F-2 can turn sharper than with MLC, while also pulling less AoA, meaning it would remain stable for longer before reaching critical AoA. Combine that with an aircraft that even in MLC mode should be more agile than the F-16s in game, being a little better than Block 10 assuming equal fuel and weapons load (even if Block 10 min fuel is lower for the theoretical) and should have higher critical AoA as well, and the F-2 will actually be really agile.
Though this all depends on Gaijin making another additional toggle only for the F-2 to let it enter a rather complicated control scheme…
6 Likes
Maybe a system that might work is something you can progressively cycle, like flaps (combat, takeoff, landing) or full real control (dampening, partial dampening, none)
Having the full capability unlocked for the F-2A is the only way to ensure that the most iconic modern Japanese aircraft isn’t dead on arrival. Hell, I’m still irked that the AAM-3 and AAM-4 is still artificially tweaked to meet the current meta. Maybe Gaijin can buff those too by the time the F-2 arrives
Yeah, that’s the automatic flaps we have now and the limiter toggle added next update that turns dampening off. MLC is already implemented for F-16s, but is permanently baked into the FM rather than actually being related to the flap movement.
So F-2 with MLC is no issue in game and would likely be implemented without problems.
But when switching from MLC to ME this would become a problem. You can’t “turn off” MLC when it’s permanent in the flight model, so that is already the first issue, but ME itself might be difficult too. In ME mode the elevators aren’t the main pitch control surface anymore, but the main wing is through the use of the leading and trailing edge flaps, similar to really big canards essentially.
This way, F-2 in ME mode doesn’t push the tail down to turn, but instead pulls the plane up into the turn with additional lift.
This is a completely different way of controlling the plane, and might be difficult for Gaijin to model. But who knows, maybe perfecting it is why Gaijin is taking so long.
Yeah, without ME I feel like flight performance will be underwhelming, and I doubt it could match the Eurocanards on MLC alone.
Would be nice to see AAM-3 and AAM-4 fixed too though as a way to make up for limited weapon loadouts of 4 + 4 (IR + ARH / ASM if we get any) and lack of HMD. Maybe the debatable outer underwing MRM or the inner pylon ASMs could be added too, but those would still be lacking compared to Eurocanards or Su-30SM
3 Likes