Likely; AN/APG-82, JASSM-ER, AIM-9X, AIM-120Ds and other EW related additions.
JSI has not been built yet. The IRST received one F-15J(M) (Type I) ADTW, unrelated to JSI.
1 Like
Why do you claim it if it is already known that JSI will have new AESA radar
aesa imo isn’t that relevant, it will still play basically the same as the f-15jm for wt purposes. the normal mech f-15j radar is more than good enough alrdy
not the AAM-5?
1 Like
Or just adding Malaysia’s F/A-18 with AIM-120 C-7 and Su-30MKM with R77
I mean that you claimed only IRST while it won’t get it IRL but AESA radar
Also new A-G like JASSM but it is not missile for WT
It is not clear will JSI use domestic missiles because of US radar
They are doing studyings about it so mostly it will use AAM-5 and AAM-4 but not clear while they haven’t done JSI
2 Likes
ah ok thx for explaining it
fairs, idrc about IRL too much, I just care about what’s going to be relevant to wt. speaking of, do the Japanese f-15j get bol cms irl?
Here isn’t any BOL in JSDF using
1 Like
AAM-4B, or just give it D-3s since its technically compatible on the F-15J/(M) anyways.
1 Like
Oh hell no.
1 Like
Hopefully the R&D of this thing go smooth and fast so we can have competitive Japanese missile flavor in the future
3 Likes
Fast… First prototypes will be placed on F-2 in 2030s
Don’t remember is there any carrier what will get it faster
pain
Is there a HMD on F2B?
How is the FM btw compared to real life ??
U seem knowledgeable so I’m curious :)
Here isn’t HMD on any F-2
Is there any information about angles of J/ASQ-2? Currently it has same angles as J/APR-4 (+/-45 degrees), the only difference between them - J/ASQ-2 is capable of detecting K-band. All really modern RWR (like ones on eurofighter or rafale) have angles +/-90 degrees, and I think J/ASQ-2 may has these angles as well.
F-2B is a two-seat aircraft mainly for training purposes. It’s basically even “worse” than some modernised F-2A.
It is very close, pretty much the single issue is the response rate at high speeds. IRL the plane’s FBW was specifically tuned using ideal responses based on speed and AoA to behave similarly at all speeds, loads, and altitudes, while the plane currently behaves similarly at all loads and altitudes, its high speed pitch response is lacking.
This is due to the game’s implementation of ME, a fbw control scheme implemented on the F-2. In ME the flaperons are deployed automatically depending on AoA and speed. With its controls being mixed with MLC control laws for the prior stated effect. However in game ME is not adaptive depending on speed, nor mixed with MLC adaptively, instead being a fixed relation. This leads to a slower pitch in response at high speeds due to the lower AoA relative to turn performance at high speeds.
1 Like