I see. Thank you for admitting that your claims about the HMD on F-2 are lie because instead of finding and providing sources you started changing the theme of concersation.
1 Like
kh38mt at this point is just a pure punching bag
I only matched your reply, given thats the only thing you reply asking
again that is what I was TOLD keyword here TOLD if english is not a language you can understand I can kindly include a definition.
The reason is “russian” vehicle
If your answer on question where from you got information that something is missing in WT is asking about some meme theme - it is clear proof that you doesn’t have any information.
And it is not first time. I am asking for any sources about HMD for about an half of month and get nothing what could be used for bug report but instead of sharing “source” you just continue claiming that HMD was tested on F-2 501.
Sorry for my rude but it is very unpleasant story.
1 Like
If only it was at least that…
5 Likes
On the topic of F-2 HMD, I swear to god someone sent a picture of it here with explanation.
me actively searching all the discords im in and the DM conversations I have to find said proof, As someone who has over 3000+ images with a single person talking about aircraft and ground vehicles. It is not a simple task
Not to mention I am doing external research through reading japans mod.go info to see if I can find any information there (which reading large documents like those is difficult cause I struggle reading large texts)
again its not a simple task and will take more time
So could I ask you send information “HMD was tested on F-2 501” only when the source will be found
Current situation is as funny as Early access games, where you always hear about finish version and “it will be finished soon” but in total get nothing
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/8SbbOV68dUAE
There is this bug report with an attached image showing
However I do wanna try get my hands on it
We’ve already looked through dozens of active and archived mod.go pages, along with MIC ones and others which cataloged developments, including TRDI’s old page and ATLA’s current one. The only HMD projects from 2010-2017 were for prototyping for the F-X, and on JHMCS AAM-5B integration.
2 Likes
For me information is nothing,
I mean F16a ocu irl can’t carry amraam no HMD ,but in the game it get both,
So all i need is just give me the HMD.
I apologise my ability to read alot of text as well as IRL matters are of unimportance only to prove something in a game.
But I am trying my best here
Me, this is my image. It is not proof of it being tested, the document very clearly says that it’s an increase in processing power for a potential future installation, not that one was installed.
We have already bug reported this, under the possibility of it atleast in theory being compatible, but Gaijin has said that is not sufficient for HMDs.
Document Title page:
Spoiler
6 Likes
Could you link me a few of those if you can in private message?
Yes and here isn’t any information about testing HMD on F-2
Only what this text says about is that processor was powered at like 20% for probable future stuff and weapons
It doesn’t mean that actually plane got some stuff or code for HMD but just that computers got more computing power
So non-historical armament of F-16A OCU is issue of non-historic F-16A OCU and doesn’t mean that F-2 should be non-historical from my point of view
5 Likes
likewise for virtually every other craft in the game
I agreed, but this is work of gaijin they just want to balance game so it’s make sense to give the f2a a HMD at least for ir version .
I guess in the future gaijin will give HMD to F2a anyway,
but right now f2a is not worthy for 13.7 because it’s had no HMD i think