IIRC, the GCS-1 requires a temperature difference of 50 degrees C to track targets. So, honestly, well it probably can track tanks, the thing is it’d be very inconsistent in game, with it just not tracking colder targets/targets on hotter maps.
So, well yes it honestly probably could technically, it probably can technically track tanks, the inconsistencies would make it not even reliable enough to actually take into a battle.
This is indeed the GCS-1 Seeker
Source Not sure if i can disclose it yet lemme ask rq
50/50 due to its dual wavelength it can operate with lower and higher tempreture
do you have a source for this? I was looking for it recently, could only find different sources talking it being a potential upgrade.
I do I just have to search my DM’s on discord for it (over 3000 of it ) so it’ll take me a while to find it
Source is on japanese mod.go.jp ➞ Once I find the link I’ll edit it in
➞ This referrs to my previous statement of the low and high temperature targets
iirc Smin said if it was trialed, it’d be added.
so if you do find it, that’d be perfect ^^!
now the fun part is to find the proof of it (fun)
Considering QDIPs (Quantum Dot Infrared Photodetectors) didn’t exist until 1997-98, no, this is not for the the GCS-1.
This is for the GCS-1 just later development’s for it
Dude the technology this talks about literally did not exist yet.
" just later development’s for it " he said
but idk abt GCS-1 later developments, did they have separate Designations?
also why would they be talking about dual wavelength on a topic about the GCS-1 and nothing BUT the GCS-1
Where does this presentation says it’s about GCS-1? You have made multiple loud statements (HMD was tested! GCS-1 can track tanks!) and yet there is no solid proofs of anything from you.
As far as I know how humanity works - we don’t mass produce smth with one desigh and designation, and then decide to produce smth with different design and stll keep same designation. It’s simply unconvinient. It could be GCS-1M/GCS-1 Kai/GCS-2, but not same GCS-1. At the moment I’m more confident that this entire document is not about GCS-1 at all. If you can provide proofs of opposite - fine. But for now we didn’t see proofs from you
lol
I mean, there are already 2 GCS-1s. The Mk. 82 500 lb GCS-1 and the M117 750lb GCS-1.
Also fun fact: the GCS-2 is actually a real thing. Its a 2000 lb GPS guided glide bomb.
And the first one is type I, while the second one is type II, right? They have different designations then.
Any signs of IR seeker? Even if so - we are talking about GCS-1, not about GCS-2.
-removed
-paper, but all parts existed
-real and flew
Ron shouldn’t have included Kikka in the fake list.
I wouldn’t have included the Yak-141 in the first place. It flew, it’s a cool plane, close enough. If we’re gonna be ahistorical anyway, might as well get something out of it.
